LeclaireRyan Ronald Herzog - Interesting motion by Cole.
Agree 100%. Herzog should be in the cross hairs. Not for the claim, that is on Cowan. As my complaint alleged Herzog participated in a scheme to extort a low insurance settlement from Tauriga. He did not make any effort to return Tauriga's work papers until after the Febuary mediation. Why didn't Herzog make any attempts to prior to the lawsuit being filed to return the work papers.
Why do you suppose Cowan didn't respond to Taurigia's requests to transfer the work papers? Why do you suppose a seasoned ole geiser like Herzog took until March to return them. Cowan, Meyler and Herzog knew the rules, right.
It is hilarious that Herzog mentions mitigation. Mitigation would have included the advancement of ill gotten gains and immediately.
I keep thinking about how shady Cowan Meyler and Herzog are, and how they tried to deceive the Court by failing to disclose the relationship they had with Cherry Bakeart a company they used like a sub contractor. Meyler even forced TAUG to use Cherry Bakeart after they were put on notice that the previous year audit was not independent. I doubt the PCAOB issued a report in November of 2014 and missed that violation. Funny how they mentioned transplanted clients but not mention a company like Cherry Bakeart.
I suppose if Herzog is going to sue me for RICO I should start encouraging people to make websites about him and LeclaireRyan. I bet the senior partners at Leclaire will love the websites. When its done I would be happy to email to all the lawyers at the firm. I am sure they will get a good laugh.
Didn't Cowan admit an email to the court as evidence, but didn't dispute any of the allegations made. That email accused them of committing fraud on the court yet I have not seen any affidavit disputing that Cowan had a relationship with the FLORIDA office of Cherry Bakeart. I would hope that a deception like this, combined with Cowan's series of misconduct would be enough to have the judge deny the motion. After all, Cowan did put discovery on the back burner before the court ruled on the motion.
I am beginning to love the exhibits or non exhibits by Cowan. For instance, an unsigned confidentiality agreement.
Why aren't the drafts that were made included in the Motion....Could it be that as part of terms to transfer the case to New Jersey was that the trial date remain the same.. Oh boy....the Court will get a rise out of that if that was the case. Imagine if Cowan agreed to keep the trial date January 23rd, 2017 if the case was transferred to New Jersey. That would make Cowan's motion look very very silly. Seth apparently did not agree with a blanket confidentiality regarding discovery.
Who is being forced to comply with discovery? Cowan or Tauriga
Who wants blanket confidentiality on discovery? Cowan or Tauriga
Well Johnnnieee..if you guessed Cowan you would be a winner!
Comparing this to a DECN case that is pending, this case seems to be going much faster when you consider that the parties had to do mediation first.
