InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 31
Posts 1742
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/26/2014

Re: MarkDaniels post# 37046

Monday, 09/26/2016 11:35:02 AM

Monday, September 26, 2016 11:35:02 AM

Post# of 50022
The problem with your statement is that the funding comes from Belgium. First off, let's note that it has been stated many times Rontan does not want to do business with GDSI (their own words). It stated in the bottom of that article that GDSI was going to push legal action. So how can they push legal action if they are getting funding now from Belgium?

The SPSA clearly states that in order for the contract to be valid, General American Capital had to be the one funding the deal...

So let's touch up on your little website theory... Is it not possible that they just never update their website? They have no business so what reason would anyone ever go there other than investors? Just because you think you can read between the lines doesn't make you right.

So in conclusion, if the contract is actually breachable, there would be no European funding, it would have to come from GACP. Your statements contradict simple due diligence and do not add up. Right now the only thing this company has going for it, is investors are still putting in money for some odd reason. These guys are known crooks, but people still will say they are "golden"