Thursday, August 11, 2016 1:10:08 PM
1) If he did have any proof, all of his counter-claims would not have been dismissed.
2) If he had any proof, he wouldn't have waited three years to file suit.
WaWa's goof ball legal shenanigans are, and always were, only about garnering sympathy and "shareholder loans." Almost certainly, a large percentage of those "shareholder loans" end up in WaWa's pockets ... as did the proceeds from the dirt sales.
"Libenter homines id quod volunt credunt"
Axis Technologies Group and Carbonis Forge Ahead with New Digital Carbon Credit Technology • AXTG • Apr 24, 2024 3:00 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Successful Equipment Test at Bishop Gold Mill, Inyo County, California • NBRI • Apr 23, 2024 9:41 AM
Epazz, Inc.: CryObo, Inc. solar Bitcoin operations will issue tokens • EPAZ • Apr 23, 2024 9:20 AM
Avant Technologies Launches Advanced AI Supercomputing Network and Expansive Data Solutions • AVAI • Apr 23, 2024 8:00 AM
BestGrowthStocks.com Issues Comprehensive Analysis of Triller Merger with AGBA Group Holding Limited • AGBA • Apr 22, 2024 1:00 PM
Cannabix Technologies to Present Marijuana Breathalyzer Technology at International Association for Chemical Testing (IACT) Conference in California • BLO • Apr 22, 2024 8:49 AM