InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 132
Posts 39819
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 12/19/2003

Re: martin33 post# 44809

Thursday, 08/11/2016 1:10:08 PM

Thursday, August 11, 2016 1:10:08 PM

Post# of 80414
Obviously WaWa doesn't have any proof.

1) If he did have any proof, all of his counter-claims would not have been dismissed.

2) If he had any proof, he wouldn't have waited three years to file suit.

WaWa's goof ball legal shenanigans are, and always were, only about garnering sympathy and "shareholder loans." Almost certainly, a large percentage of those "shareholder loans" end up in WaWa's pockets ... as did the proceeds from the dirt sales.

"Libenter homines id quod volunt credunt"