InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
4,967.23
(
-0.88%
)
US TECH 100
16,556.80
(
-2.24%
)
Dow Jones
37,986.40
(
0.56%
)
Brent Oil
86.63
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
63,950.30
(
0.20%
)
Post# of 489
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

scion

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 245
Posts 55847
Boards Moderated 12
Alias Born 04/12/2001

scion

Member Level

Re: scion post# 434

Tuesday, 08/02/2016 9:43:54 AM

Tuesday, August 02, 2016 9:43:54 AM

Post# of 489
III. Conclusion

For all of the substantive and procedural reasons above, Defendants’ motion to quash the bank subpoenas (ECF Doc. 65) should be denied and the subpoenas should not be modified in any respect.

Dated: August 1, 2016

Extract -
Doc 73 PDF file
https://www.scribd.com/document/319967621/USA-v-RaPower-3-et-al-Doc-73-filed-01-Aug-16-pdf
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up