InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2563
Posts 299633
Boards Moderated 29
Alias Born 04/12/2001

Re: HopScotch2 post# 6679

Sunday, 07/31/2016 3:04:15 PM

Sunday, July 31, 2016 3:04:15 PM

Post# of 7135
My guess would be that the SEC didn't find the custodianships simply because they weren't looking for them. And Tracy hasn't sent any of the documents demanded. I doubt he's spoken with them, either.

How could Tracy disclose the SEC investigation in a public court filing prior to it becoming public record? Did the SEC action come before or after the custodianships?

Tracy announced he was getting into the shell business in early 2014:

http://www.prleap.com/pr/217488/securities-law-firm-seeks-shareholders-of

But none of the Nevada custodianships are from that early. He seems to have begun in earnest in 2015; most are from fairly late in the year. The order of investigation is from 28 October 2015:

https://www.scribd.com/document/317929010/Tracy-S-1s

While it was originally non-public information, it's been filed in a federal district court, so it's now in the public domain. The SEC didn't ask for the documents to be sealed. So it seems to me Tracy should have disclosed the investigation to the Nevada court.