InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 168
Posts 21331
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/11/2006

Re: mr-truthbetold post# 38231

Friday, 07/01/2016 8:44:41 AM

Friday, July 01, 2016 8:44:41 AM

Post# of 47873
Re BK talk, I think given that we've heard NOTHING and the payments are now overdue and the possibility exists that PP wants/needs money ASAP - despite saying otherwise, this subject is completely valid to discuss. My position is that Platinum's situation makes anything possible by them, so the question to me is simply: do they stand to gain more by declaring default than by not declaring default? The only way I think the answer could be 'yes' is if

1. It can wipe out shareholders. That's what a BK could do.
2. They can get the proceeds from selling the IP.

It seems #2 is not likely given the subordination clause in the 10-k, but I'm no expert on these matters. It also seems ISC could make a decent case for being able to pay PP over time without having to sell the IP right away - so no quick fix for PP.

BOTTOM LINE: BK seems unlikely EVEN IF PP needs a big chunk of money ASAP.

For microcap opportunities in the hot Virtual Reality sector, see my board

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.