Friday, June 24, 2016 10:25:04 AM
Scott has no control at all.
I dont think anyone would argue that Scott is responcible for the demise of the stock.
Now Dan and Otto are in charge and Scott has no say.
So why is Scott still CEO?
Give me control here and the next day I would have a PR out saying Scott has stepped down and Otto will be interim CEO.
But no.... Dan and Otto in all their wisdom and power seem to think Scott as CEO is fine.
Dan has stated that Scott would steal any money given into the company but he is perfectly ok with Scott as Chief?
If he wasnt ok with it Scott would be gone since hes in control.
So either Dan and Otto are OK with Scott as CEO
Or The dont have the power to remove what they dont want.
Which is it?
VPR Brands LP Reports Record Annual Financial Performance for Fiscal Year 2023 • VPRB • Apr 19, 2024 11:24 AM
Coinllectibles' Subsidiary, Grand Town Development Limited, Acquires Rare Song Dynasty Ceramics Worth Over USD28million • COSG • Apr 18, 2024 8:03 AM
ILUS Provides Form 10-K Filing Update • ILUS • Apr 17, 2024 9:54 AM
Glucotrack Announces Expansion of Its Continuous Glucose Monitoring Technology to Epidural Glucose Monitoring • GCTK • Apr 17, 2024 8:00 AM
Maybacks Global Entertainment To Fire Up 24 New Stations in Louisiana • AHRO • Apr 16, 2024 1:30 PM
Cannabix Technologies Begins Certification of Contactless Alcohol Breathalyzer, Re-Brands product series to Breath Logix • BLOZF • Apr 16, 2024 8:52 AM