Saturday, April 30, 2016 7:07:36 AM
So, yeah - the fact that MCIG did not specify the amounts of the deposits is concerning. IMO, it suggest that concessions were made and that the actual deposits are $0 or near $0. This is problematic because the construction clients probably have contingencies written in the contracts that allow them to cancel the contract if, for example, they don't succeed in pre-leasing cultivation space.
Is there a rule that says they have to PR it? No, but why wouldn't a company do so - since it would give shareholders an idea of what MCIG will be declaring as part of revenues (since MCIG would be able to declare deposits taken as revenues).
More likely than not, MCIG didn't specify what the deposits are because they made concessions. Just like CAFS did, back in the day. Someone denied that too. RFLMAO.
BTW, it was me who first indicated that deposits are customary at about 10% of the value of a construction contract. After my complaints, MCIG PR'd that they actually closed on a deal.....and accepting an undeclared deposit. I was right about that too :)
3/29/15
~Bubba
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=112207820
3/29/16
~Les
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=112208979
3/29/15
~Bubba
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=112210051
7/19/15
~Bubba
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=115523873
7/19/15
7/19/15
~worksfornickels
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=115526207
7/19/15
10/5/15
~Bubba
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=117489075
You and I went thru a similar discussion about CAFS Revenue Projections - where, ultimately - I said CAFS was nowhere close to bringing in any kind of significant revenue. Guess what? Their last quarter CAFS had $0 in gross revenues. ZERO.
Here's what YOU said about cafs
5/12/15
~Les
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=113572979
Looks like concessions were made by CAFS didn't it.
MCIG is in a very similar situation. Concessions were likely made re: deposits - and contingencies were probably built into the construction contracts.
So, people should not be surprised at all if something bad happens to these construction contracts and the revenues end up being $0 if clients back out on either phases or projects.
The only way MCIG generates revenues is when they actually complete a phase and collect $
The ability to execute and complete in a timely manner is crucial. If MCIG is late.....that will f*** shareholders big time
Axis Technologies Group and Carbonis Forge Ahead with New Digital Carbon Credit Technology • AXTG • Apr 24, 2024 3:00 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Successful Equipment Test at Bishop Gold Mill, Inyo County, California • NBRI • Apr 23, 2024 9:41 AM
Epazz, Inc.: CryObo, Inc. solar Bitcoin operations will issue tokens • EPAZ • Apr 23, 2024 9:20 AM
Avant Technologies Launches Advanced AI Supercomputing Network and Expansive Data Solutions • AVAI • Apr 23, 2024 8:00 AM
BestGrowthStocks.com Issues Comprehensive Analysis of Triller Merger with AGBA Group Holding Limited • AGBA • Apr 22, 2024 1:00 PM
Cannabix Technologies to Present Marijuana Breathalyzer Technology at International Association for Chemical Testing (IACT) Conference in California • BLO • Apr 22, 2024 8:49 AM