KeyOn Communications Holdings, Inc. (fka KEYO)

[Poptech]

lesn: That post had nothing to do with my post about Nate's 10 filing. It also had nothing to do with your claim that Nantworks is a subsidiary of Keyon. So, I am not tracking where you got any of that from.

I did not say there was a Nate's common share exchange like you are proposing would happen with Keyo. There was no such exchange. Nate's did not issue new shares. None of these claims happened. I didn't 'ask you.' I answered your questions.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=121681916

once the privco merges w/ the pubco sub, the privco is effectively then the sub of the parent pubco, and the merged into pubco sub (in this case, Keyon (NV)) immediately files for dissolution as a matter of law.

Obviously, that can't happen in KEYO's case since the dissolution was filed years ago. Your steps would suggest the KEYO RTM is ruled out entirely.

In this wild RTM scheme, Nantworks would have to remain a subsidiary of Keyon or face $10s of millions in IRS penalties. Keyon, which has no management, would have to run Nantworks.