InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 92
Posts 28797
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 04/19/2013

Re: Jason Coombs post# 5221

Tuesday, 03/22/2016 8:44:30 AM

Tuesday, March 22, 2016 8:44:30 AM

Post# of 6440
I can see theres NO WAY youre going to disclose the agreements for review, which are at the heart of your proposed plan to assume control of ADIA. This much you made clear. Instead you have painted a picture that all your ducks are lined up to accomplish your goals. Perhaps a reason why shares in ADIA have experienced unusual activity recently. Of course, the agreements disclosing all your claims are being kept secret by you.

Those shares ARE considered outstanding. Look at the share structure disclosed on OTC Markets and in the multi-part SEC filing I referenced. The improperly-issued shares will be clawed back. I believe this to be the case for several reasons, not the least of which is that I was told by the attorney for Shelly Singhal that the shares would be returned after I had new capital raised.



Yes, those shares are considered outstanding, I guess. However, your claim they were improperly issued and will be returned makes it clear they shouldnt be and will not be outstanding. Therefore current shareholders have already been unjustly diluted with the same shares you intend to "reissue" to raise capital. Its a joke you characterize this as non dilutive to shareholders.. A JOKE!

Also, your basis to reclaim those "claw back" shares is relative to what Singhal's attorney said? LOL Is there anymore teeth to your or ADIA's legal right to take back those shares?

Anyway, evading the disclosure of the agreements has made it clear you will not allow shareholders to evaluate for themselves. Typical penny stock BS

Have a nice day