InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 92
Posts 28797
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 04/19/2013

Re: Jason Coombs post# 5217

Monday, 03/21/2016 2:09:00 PM

Monday, March 21, 2016 2:09:00 PM

Post# of 6440
Having a hard time believing this

I have already been more than transparent and 100% truthful in describing.



More than transparent when you havent even provided the agreements? If anything, thats less than transparent. As far as being truthful, my guess is you are. However, that doesnt mean your interpretation of contracts and ability to perform is feasible. That should be left up to each and every shareholder/potential investor, not to your discretion

No Accredited Investor other than those offering toxic debt will agree to invest in a turnaround story in which the non-Accredited public investors retain their current relative ownership positions.



Now this makes no sense and confirms why interpretations of the above referenced agreements is better left to investors to decide for themselves.

Just how would you or anyone else propose current public shareholders to retain their equity ownership percentages in ADIA if new equity was invested into the company? Its impossible! This has nothing to do with finding the right investors. Dilution occurs as new equity investments are accepted. That simple. I have no idea what youre thinking here unless you want to provide current shareholders with anti-dilution rights which would certainly end any discussion with a new potential equity investor

I will publish the Agreements when my Power of Attorney is finalized. It is pointless and potentially misleading to do so before that time.



If you truly felt providing these agreements were pointless and MISLEADING, why did you post a link to the filing where you felt they were available?? Also, if you feel the agreements are misleading, then youre making a case what your interpretation is will differ from what we might read for ourselves.