Quote BS LOL, "BTW if this were the case, then the new owners could rename the new subsidiary, call in the remaining legitimate shares for exch with new shares. By doing so all the illegal Naked Shares would be worthless and the Mother of ALL Short Squeezes would drive the PPS sky high as Naked Shorters must buy to cover and deliver to the purchasers!
"
WHAT???????? LOL !!!!! WHAT supposed "illegal naked shares", LOL??????
1) The open short interest on this NO REVENUE, NO PRODUCT little micro-cap is company is and has been noise level
2) There is ZERO proof that any so called "naked shorts" or so called "illegal naked shares" (WHAT does that even mean, LOL????) ZERO proof any such thing exist in relation to this company or its shares, LOL !!! Another myth that has its origins at the usual little magic stem cell blog site thingy.
Like OCATA and Astella and their highly professional M&A LAWYER TEAMS from Jeffries and Citi-bank wouldn't know of this myth of the "illegal naked shares" IF THEY EVEN EXISTED, LOL?????? Two of the top M&A firms on planet earth and one of the largest global banks on the planet- with Ivy League attorney departments staffed as thick as an old Yellow Pages phone book, LOL !!
TOTAL BS NONSENSE IMO. Not a shred of proof that any such scenario exists.
Posts contain only my amateur opinions, personal views and thoughts. I discuss stocks as a hobby only. Always do one's own due diligence before investing.
