InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
4,967.23
(
-0.88%
)
US TECH 100
16,558.00
(
-2.23%
)
Dow Jones
37,986.40
(
0.56%
)
Brent Oil
86.63
(
0.24%
)
Bitcoin
63,958.40
(
0.71%
)
Post# of 18904
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

gitreal

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 183
Posts 40985
Boards Moderated 5
Alias Born 03/21/2012

gitreal

Member Level

Re: gnolfinvestor post# 16440

Wednesday, 11/25/2015 4:38:09 PM

Wednesday, November 25, 2015 4:38:09 PM

Post# of 18904
Since the SEC does not recognize the term indicated resource at all, who is going to tell them whether it is allowed to include "resources" below 100 meters? It is all hype to sell shares anyway, so why not extrapolate to the bottom of the deepest hole, especially since the veins are widening with depth?

And who exactly has said the "resource" consists of $1.5 billion worth of minerals? The company didn't - they know the SEC would not react well to that. I guess it's okay for investors to think that way, no matter how meaningless it is.

Mining Company Research Board http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/board.aspx?board_id=21803

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up