In particular, does Bourque Industries have any activity working toward financial affluence ?
Can the Hurting in the Dark Shareholders view Bourque Industries from a point of view avoiding the negatives and bashing ?
If the Hurting in the Dark Shareholder bring accusations against Bourque Industries or its management, is that counter productive to the shareholders interest to protect their investment ?
To provide opinions of only non-negative points of view towards Bourque Industries requires a disembodied approach to free from reality any activity taken by Bourque Industries where opportunities for growth and positive activity will be hindered or have an agenda to prevent success so as to deny realization by the Hurting in the Dark Shareholders that all along Kryron has been a hoax.
If Bourque Industries clearly has activity that is working toward financial affluence, then I shall remain vigilant and keep my sanity intact as I take note and follow the progress so communicated from Bourque Industries to the Hurting in the Dark Shareholders. But to accept hearsay, especially that generated from John Bourque, to be accepted as official communication to the shareholders, is to repeat acknowledged mistakes taken in 2011 where John Bourque propagated misleading and false information to the shareholders.
Facts known today by the Hurting in the Dark Shareholders:
1. Only John Bourque knows the full details to execute a Kryron Process, as so evident during his absence from Bourque Industries for two years.
2. Observing opportunities for growth and positive activity at Bourque Industries currently is just an echo of that suggested by Bourque Industries in 2011.
3. With the recent authorized, and now issued one billion shares, Bourque Industries executive management and board of directors have continued to present Bourque Industries to the Market as an empty shell where BORK has been monetized and supplied John Bourque with an additional share count such that he retains a majority holding.
4. There is no audit at Bourque Industries to determine if the Kryron samples made in secret by John Bourque reflect a true and accurate description of what the company web site declares as a new alloy, this as it allows a continuation of Kryron being a hoax if it so is.
5. Just as Bourque Industries did not notify the Hurting in the Dark Shareholders of the authorization of one billion shares in 2014, the Hurting in the Dark Shareholders can perceive the significance of how this type of event happened to be an acceptable method taken by Bourque Industries to continue to monetize BORK and supply John Bourque with an unlimited amount of new shares.
6. Bourque Industries today is a repeat of itself in 2011, surely with the same agenda.
Doug
