Friday, October 02, 2015 11:14:22 PM
Please provide specific evidence of this claim.
The stock sales are listed in the quarterly and annual reports, as are the sales of product and the costs of manufacturing and distribution etc. How, exactly, in light of that, is the company making money from selling stock, any more than to meet expenses and production of Sucanon for distribution? What, exactly, is the evidence for the previous claim that "hundreds of millions of shares printed at zero cost basis" when at last report some 317 million shares total were outstanding? Where is the "pump" claimed so vividly? The promoters?
If the FDA application was just for a news release, where was the dilution of dump surrounding that announcement? For that matter, why put out information for a "pump" that states the company cannot sell Sucanon in the US as a Neutraceutical? While the acknowledgment that Sucanon should be considered a drug for US application, that cuts both ways in that a significant expense would be required to bring it to market. Not IMO a piece of news that will cause an immediate unjustified spike in stock price.
I have laid out my argument with the science of Sucanon studies. Let's see some cold hard facts on the above so they can be evaluated by any here that are interested
Coinllectibles' Subsidiary, Grand Town Development Limited, Acquires Rare Song Dynasty Ceramics Worth Over USD28million • COSG • Apr 18, 2024 8:03 AM
ILUS Provides Form 10-K Filing Update • ILUS • Apr 17, 2024 9:54 AM
Glucotrack Announces Expansion of Its Continuous Glucose Monitoring Technology to Epidural Glucose Monitoring • GCTK • Apr 17, 2024 8:00 AM
Maybacks Global Entertainment To Fire Up 24 New Stations in Louisiana • AHRO • Apr 16, 2024 1:30 PM
Cannabix Technologies Begins Certification of Contactless Alcohol Breathalyzer, Re-Brands product series to Breath Logix • BLOZF • Apr 16, 2024 8:52 AM
Kona Gold Beverages, Inc. Acquires Surge Distribution LLC from Loud Beverage Group, Inc. (LBEV) • KGKG • Apr 16, 2024 8:30 AM