Monday, July 27, 2015 5:45:29 PM
Why would they be? All they have to do is let them both die on the vine. Neither company has demonstrated the ability to sell product. MCIG is a wanna be distributor; VTCQ is a one trick pony. Neither have anything disruptive...and neither have proven ability to sell product.
The excuse of being a young company has run its course.
The fluffy PRs have run their course.
The "wait a year" line has run its course.
The only thing that will make these stock shares go up in price is sales at this point - because noone believes Paul anymore.
IMO, the next financials being release have to exceed expectations - and hopefully, the numbers aren't cooked.
Axis Technologies Group and Carbonis Forge Ahead with New Digital Carbon Credit Technology • AXTG • Apr 24, 2024 3:00 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Successful Equipment Test at Bishop Gold Mill, Inyo County, California • NBRI • Apr 23, 2024 9:41 AM
Epazz, Inc.: CryObo, Inc. solar Bitcoin operations will issue tokens • EPAZ • Apr 23, 2024 9:20 AM
Avant Technologies Launches Advanced AI Supercomputing Network and Expansive Data Solutions • AVAI • Apr 23, 2024 8:00 AM
BestGrowthStocks.com Issues Comprehensive Analysis of Triller Merger with AGBA Group Holding Limited • AGBA • Apr 22, 2024 1:00 PM
Cannabix Technologies to Present Marijuana Breathalyzer Technology at International Association for Chemical Testing (IACT) Conference in California • BLO • Apr 22, 2024 8:49 AM