Summerblaze: What about Wave's last reverse split--after the extension ran out? It sure looked like a rubber stamp to me, after all the shenanigans the mgt pulled and the lies they told, the incompetence they showed in the Safend purchase and other stinky bits of crapping on shareholders.
On the other hand, Player, to my knowledge strictly sticks to the facts and has correctly called many Wave events beforehand.
Many years ago, I wrote to the Naz, asking them about their policies on extensions, and if Wave's many unmet predictions of profitability counted, or the shabby treatment of shareholders.
I got a form reply, stating someone would be in touch with me. No one ever did, and the issue died. I provided specifics and it looked to me as if the Naz cared more about their protecting equity companies, than protecting shareholders.
I suppose that is their mission, but they are not supposed to tolerate outright deception, which is what we have been given as a steady diet for more than 10 years--continuing without change, under the new regime.
I am betting Player is right and Wave, despite being critically, if not fatally wounded, Wave's undeserving request for more time, IMO should not be granted. They will just use it to fleece more shareholders out of more money. Nevertheless, I expect Wave to get the extension.
When did Wave ever meet a publicly-stated goal or performance target? Answer? Never. Not since inception.
Unless you can state some reason why your statement should be considered over Player's--who has a long history of being right about Wave and regulatory matters--you may find yourself disregarded.
Many have come here claiming dubious authority to tell us Wave was going to the moon in a matter of days or was on the cusp of signing a "huge" contract--but it never happens.
Forgive me if we do you the injustice of requiring a little substantiation for your statements, until you earn the kind of reputation Player has among us Wave watchers.
With all due respect--Blue
