Exobox Technologies Corp (EXBX)

[FunkyCoolModena]

It is only my opinion that the unelected sole officer & director of the company was trying to do a 2000 for 1 reverse split when shareholders stopped it, thus possibly forcing the company to spend someone else's resources defending it's sole officer rather than bringing the company current with the SEC and conducting a shareholder vote.

Remember, according to an 8-K filing..

"The focus of the Company over the next few months is to bring the Company current in its financial reporting with the Securities and Exchange Commission."

http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1335002/000100233413000044/f8k080713mgt.htm

I never read anything about a reverse split when the above 8-K was filed.



Question I have is, who is more at fault? The 29-year old (soon to be 30 on Aug 8th I believe) or the former guy who handed this off?

I wonder if EXBX shareholders are ever going to see all the due diligence that was conducted when the former Chairman of the company handed off this company to someone who apparently can no longer be found.





Go Exobox Shareholders !!!!