Ha, ha, ha. I can't stop laughing. Well, release the name of this big time customer again. Just release it. It would be such an easy thing to do. You claim it has been mentioned before. So then, why not mention it again?
I used to think that this was one of those customer with whom ESFS signed a deal for one or two, and the other deals were tentative, maybe. But posters here are so obstinate about releasing information that would lead others to prove or disprove company claims that I am now leaning to believing that there is no deal at all. Ha, ha, ha.
It is even worse than, for example, the Whole Foods issue, in which the company lead investors to believe that there was a major deal when there wasn't. It's like the claim for tens of millions in signed contracts that fizzled out to less than a million. It is not just a simple case of counting chickens before they hatch. It is a case of counting chickens even before you get the eggs which you know are not coming.
LOL, LOL, LOL. You know the marketplace of investors is perfectly well aware that this is all a ruse? No wonder after all the recent claims the stock is still trading for under two cents. Nobody believes it except for a novice here and there who doesn't bother to do any DD. Some gambler may throw a few hundred dollars at this and if they are wealthy, a few thousands. But there is no credibility left with this company. It is over. Kaput. It will just linger where it is for a long time to come.
If you want to see a change, the company has to release meaningful information that the stockholders can track. The company has to make the information available; not difficult to obtain.
Oh, the deal between BRCM and Apple. Pool example for what you are trying to claim. Neither company has ever kept the name of the other secret. They just kept secret the details of any deals, which, by the way, they have been making for years, on and off, and to which thousands and thousands of people can attest. In the case of ESFS, they are keeping secret the name of the customer but releasing the numbers. Ha, ha, ha. What a joke. If there are any potential investors out there, you are turning them of with the absurd statements. You are doing my job.
Oh, and by the way, I am not talking about what transpired ten years ago. In fact, I made it very plain and clear that I am concerned about what has transpired since the restructuring which was nine years ago. From that day to now, the company has really done nothing that merits being mentioned. And, I only mentioned that the company was created twenty one years ago when some here claimed it was an upstart. Ha, ha, ha. A company still in its early stages of development. LOL.
