InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 72
Posts 103154
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 08/01/2006

Re: poster44ny post# 233875

Saturday, 05/02/2015 8:17:28 PM

Saturday, May 02, 2015 8:17:28 PM

Post# of 494641
poster44ny, the name never changed .. "In fact, according to Google Books, the usage of both
terms in books published in the United States has increased at similar rates over the past 40 years:



And a Google Scholar search reveals that the term 'climate change' was in use before the term
'global warming', and has always been the more commonly-used term in scientific literature:"
.. links with more .. http://www.skepticalscience.com/climate-change-global-warming.htm

As for your cooling scam ..

Human activity continues to warm the planet over the past 16 years

What the science says... Select a level... Intermediate Advanced

Once natural influences, in particular the impact of El Niño and La Niña, are removed from the recent
temperature record, there is no evidence of a significant change in the human contribution to climate change.
http://www.skepticalscience.com/no-warming-in-16-years.htm

the warming trend is clear.

As for your denial debate ..

Why Climate Change Denial Is Just Hot Air

By Phil Plait

I was thinking of writing a lengthy post about climate change denial being completely unscientific nonsense, but then geochemist and National Science Board member James Lawrence Powell wrote a post that is basically a slam-dunk of debunking .. http://www.desmogblog.com/2012/11/15/why-climate-deniers-have-no-credibility-science-one-pie-chart . His premise was simple: If global warming isn’t real and there’s an actual scientific debate about it, that should be reflected in the scientific journals.

He looked up how many peer-reviewed scientific papers were published in professional journals about global warming, and compared the ones supporting the idea that we’re heating up compared to those that don’t. What did he find? This:


The thin red wedge.

Image credit: James Lawrence Powell

Oh my. Powell looked at 13,950 articles. Out of all those reams of scientific results, how many disputed the reality of climate change?

Twenty-four. Yup. Two dozen. Out of nearly 14,000.

Now I know some people will just say that this is due to mainstream scientists suppressing controversy and all that, but let me be succinct: That’s bull. Science thrives on dissenting ideas, it grows and learns from them. If there is actual evidence to support an idea, it gets published. I can point out copious examples in my own field of astronomy where papers get published about all manners of against-the-mainstream thinking, some of which come to conclusions that, in my opinion, are clearly wrong.

So let this be clear: There is no scientific controversy over this. Climate change denial is purely, 100 percent made-up political and corporate-sponsored crap. When the loudest voices are fossil-fuel funded think tanks .. http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2012/01/25/five-shots-againt-global-warming-denialism , when they don’t publish in journals but instead write error-laden op-eds in partisan venues .. http://www.slate.com/blogs/bad_astronomy/2012/12/03/climate_change_deniers_write_another_fact_free_op_ed.html , when they have to manipulate the data to support their point .. http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/?p=55208 , then what they’re doing isn’t science.

It’s nonsense. And worse, it’s dangerous nonsense. Because they’re fiddling with the data while the world burns.
http://www.slate.com/blogs/bad_astronomy/2012/12/11/climate_change_denial_why_don_t_they_publish_scientific_papers.html

poster44ny, you blew it again.

See also:

No, Global Warming Has NOT Stopped By Phil Plait
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=106548882

Some 99.9999% if not 100% of these would be fuagf to poster44ny

2015 - http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/msgsearchbymember.aspx?searchID=78758&srchyr=2015&SearchStr=poster44ny

2014 - http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/msgsearchbymember.aspx?searchID=78758&srchyr=2014&SearchStr=poster44ny

2013 - http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/msgsearchbymember.aspx?searchID=78758&srchyr=2013&SearchStr=poster44ny

2012 - http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/msgsearchbymember.aspx?searchID=78758&srchyr=2012&SearchStr=poster44ny

2011 - http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/msgsearchbymember.aspx?searchID=78758&srchyr=2011&SearchStr=poster44ny

Surprised we went back so far.







It was Plato who said, “He, O men, is the wisest, who like Socrates, knows that his wisdom is in truth worth nothing”

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.