Radient Pharmaceuticals Corporation fka RXPC

[guardiangel]

Dc.....You are corect...JimTash's comments below are wrong ..I do have experience in trademarks and trademark laws...J&J tried to trademark Onco Sure after Radient went void..What he doesn't know is that the trademark was rejected because it was similar and in the same class(Medical) and would be confusing to the public and had nothing to do with a corporation being Void..The attempt was made to try to steal a trademark similiar to Onko-Sure while a company was temprarily void in nature..It is still protected by Trademark law even when a company is void...ahooololooooo

https://trademarks.justia.com/search?q=oncosure

You got that right..That is why metropolis and all the other distributors are honoring Trademark laws..Even though radient is temporarily void...


Cancer 8

Cancer 8 is an initiative by Metropolis to bring awareness about cancer detection. Cancer 8, introduced by Metropolis in India, is a simple, non-invasive and FDA cleared in vitro diagnostic (IVD) blood-marker test known as Onko-Sure®. Detect cancer early with a simple blood test

http://www.metropolisindia.com/patients


Patients - Metropolis India *

www.metropolisindia.com/patients

Patients. At Metropolis it is not just a sample or a test, ... (IVD) blood-marker test known as Onko-Sure®. Detect cancer early with a simple blood test ...


http://www.metropolisindia.com/patients/cancer-eight

dcspka Thursday, 03/26/15 09:40:47 AM
Re: guardiangel post# 28486
Post # of 28502

If you dissect the comments from Living's post regarding the J&J attempt to trademark OnCo-Sure, its apparent he is substituting his brand of logic for the actual facts regarding trademark law.


*****************************************************************
Jimtash Tuesday, 03/24/15 04:12:39 PM
Re: None
Post # of 28483

why did the trademark lawyer abandon onCosure?

because once radient was void, there was no need to worry about using onKosure . . . dead companies can't defend a trademark . . .

onkosure is being manufactured and sold, and radient has NOTHING to do with it . . . this is the reality of being void and off-patent .
******************************************************


Thanks Dc..February 24 2014 the volume was over 700 million and the pps went to .0003/.0004 before going back down to .0001/.0002..The pps went up for no reason..The deceivers were saying it was from a drug rumor..That is hard to believe and still is..The other rumor was that radient released the remaining 509 million from the outstanding.. That too is absolutely false as well..We believe from our analysis, the rise on Feb 24, 2014 was an opportunity for the creeping takeover group to get more shares in order to reach their 90 percent threshold with the help of the 5 unknown investors from jan 2011 who own 31 percent....They had to buy more at .0003 but they did buy it..I think you mentioned large buying blocks..When we bought 94 million in July 2013, that was intended for the creeping takeover group at the bargain price of.0001..It never went down to .0001 afterwards...The May 6 and 7 and afterwards was also a sell off by the retailers who bought at .0002 and the longs that held out until they saw the last 8-k from mac about voluntary revocation..'The so called doomsday as by the illusionists mentioned you understand.. They didn't fool me into selling..This was part of the plan..Voluntary revocation...Almost as good as the BK or vote for 750 million authorized increase... imo