InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 371
Posts 16689
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 03/07/2014

Re: None

Tuesday, 02/24/2015 12:03:57 PM

Tuesday, February 24, 2015 12:03:57 PM

Post# of 106824
LOL, Quote: "BHRT is moving in the right direction with their plan to use what resources and science they already have as solid building blocks. Specifically their revenues are increasing. This quarters report should be very telling.

Another advantage the company has is Mr Tomas. His professionalism, intellect, passion for success, and his proven capacity for survival will move this company of the future forward and lend to ultimate success.
"

Moving in the right direction? The common shares are at SUB ONE CENT near their all, all, all time lows? The common shares have lost about 99.98% of their value since going public in 2008 on the NASDAQ (de-listed less than about 1 yr later, OTC ever since) and the market cap is now barely cracking $5 million w/ current debts exceeding $10 million. If that is "moving in the right direction" and "forward" then it must be in some alternate stock universe I'm totally unfamiliar with IMO?

Quote: "Another advantage the company has is Mr Tomas......"

Based on what are all these vast claims made about CEO "Mr Tomas"? The common shares, since "Mr Tomas" took over 100% control of the company as CEO have lost about 98% or more of their value. When he took over in mid 2010 the common share price was right about .50 CENTS a share, maybe some spikes even higher. Today it's about .009 a share with a recent low of .007 (yes, 7/10th of ONE CENT) a share.

The simple math shows that to be a loss of approx 98% or more. Also, the shares have been massively, massively diluted under his tenure as CEO- from maybe 30 million max to now well over 600 MILLION share O/S by this next 10-K (a factor of 20X or more) and authorized shares increased to 2 BILLION on a sub one cent share price. The market cap has collapsed to maybe 1/3 of what it was when he began as CEO.

What "success" is that- in what business world? I'm not familiar with any CEO being deemed some wonderful supposed "success" based on those or any other of the BHRT standard, industry recognized metrics and realities for public traded stock companies (ROI, profitability, positive cash flow, cash mgt, going concern warnings in every SEC filing probably since he took over as CEO, little or no cash at any given time, some debt defaults, never re-started a single major FDA level trial since about the 2009/2010 time frame despite numerous "claims" it would happen, never inked a single "large" non dilutive "financing deal" despite numerous claims and PR that it would take place, etc, etc, etc)

Where does all this supposed "knowledge" of "Mr Tomas" come from- versus what is known via only the public available metrics and company performance and public available, verifiable info?

Makes ZERO sense to me, IMO? Not seeing it? Not seeing where one would even get the supposed "personal" type info to make those claims about him as CEO- as it's "personal" info about him and not public info of him as a company CEO based on his CEO performance metrics or what can be found based on company metrics, performance, common stock performance, the company's on-going desperate financial condition, massive on-going share dilution, etc?

I mean- how does one supposedly know "Mr Tomas'" supposed "intellect"? How is that even possible? Is there a public available IQ test they published or some other recognized metric or standardized academia or similar test that they as a company did or something and then made available to the general investing public? How does one know the "intellect" of a CEO in supposed detail?

Again, not seeing how that's even possible or even makes one iota of sense IMO?

"his capacity for survival"?? Is he on a TV show like "survivor man" or something that I missed where they test and demonstrate one's professional level "survival" skills, etc? Again, where is this public info about his "survival capacity"? How does one even measure a person's "survival capacity" - using what standard metrics or test (was it a military survival test he passed for example? Those are standardized and well recognized, but I've never seen any public, published info he passed a "survival test" that I know of?)- again, where are the public details on these wonderful, vast "claims" like "ability to survive" and all the rest?

I'd love to know where to find this public info- it's fascinating IMO.