Tuesday, February 24, 2015 11:18:09 AM
I am aware of certain failed processes which have been used, even at Bourque Industries, to reproduce Kryron. If the correct protocol is not used failure will follow. Only a few at BORK knew the correct protocol. Others did not and wasted resources doing things incorrectly and not knowing it, and thusly produced an inferior material that failed some tests. I am not portraying myself as a Kryron expert. However over time I have learned a few things by carefully reading, listening, and observing. What I do know I currently consider the intellectual property of Bourque Industries, I therefore don't currently feel free to divulge it. I I do suspect that the failed reproductions may have lead to some bad test results. I have seen and handled material produced correctly and incorrectly, and knowing the general production concept and with some physics education, the difference in the results is observable. I have discussed what I have learned with some who are highly trained, experienced, and credentialized in the fields of physics and engineering and received concurring conclusions.
VPR Brands LP Reports Record Annual Financial Performance for Fiscal Year 2023 • VPRB • Apr 19, 2024 11:24 AM
Coinllectibles' Subsidiary, Grand Town Development Limited, Acquires Rare Song Dynasty Ceramics Worth Over USD28million • COSG • Apr 18, 2024 8:03 AM
ILUS Provides Form 10-K Filing Update • ILUS • Apr 17, 2024 9:54 AM
Glucotrack Announces Expansion of Its Continuous Glucose Monitoring Technology to Epidural Glucose Monitoring • GCTK • Apr 17, 2024 8:00 AM
Maybacks Global Entertainment To Fire Up 24 New Stations in Louisiana • AHRO • Apr 16, 2024 1:30 PM
Cannabix Technologies Begins Certification of Contactless Alcohol Breathalyzer, Re-Brands product series to Breath Logix • BLOZF • Apr 16, 2024 8:52 AM