InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 9
Posts 732
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/27/2011

Re: None

Thursday, 02/05/2015 7:45:23 PM

Thursday, February 05, 2015 7:45:23 PM

Post# of 33394
Sparky - don't think so.

Playboy is demonstrating that:

1) Playbev never met the trademark license agreement requirement for minimum sales. Playbev has lost the trademark license.
2) Playbev is using the trademark license without authorization and has not paid appropriate royalties.

As I have posted previously, Cirtran has not even accrued the royalties, so the 10K filings are misrepresented and will need to be restated.

3) Damages should be awarded to Playboy for lost royalties.

No way Mr. Iehab will take care of shareholders. He has not in the past. He will not in the future.