InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 9
Posts 2581
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/15/2012

Re: conix post# 11759

Thursday, 01/22/2015 10:18:53 AM

Thursday, January 22, 2015 10:18:53 AM

Post# of 15274
"The authors have provided their names and credentials."???

Yeah, but what they DIDN'T "provide" is MUCH more important and was an explanation as to WHY they did NOT use the data they presented at the nursing conference:

soooooooo much more impressive data

...when the results they reported THERE was SO much more superior to the results reported in the journal article.

Doesn't that seem a little STRANGE to you? I mean, after all, reducing subjects pain from "8.4" to "1.2" is a WHOLE lot more impressive than reducing it from "5" to "2" -- don't you agree? Ditto for reducing allodynia from "77%" to "15%" and cutting opioid intake by HALF! Don't YOU wish they had used the nursing conference numbers instead?

Also note that "Patrick Coyne" did NOT appear on the conference abstract, but NOW appears as SECOND author on the journal one. What EXACTLY did he do between the conference paper and the published paper that earned him second place?









Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.