InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 18
Posts 2155
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 10/23/2009

Re: sanbrunobaby post# 66860

Sunday, 01/11/2015 12:22:07 PM

Sunday, January 11, 2015 12:22:07 PM

Post# of 67010
I can't be bothered to find it if you can't be bothered to link it. I mean, did you see the letter in Edgar from the SEC to Guyer about the upcoming fishing trip? Just gotta look for it.

The 43-101 topic is just downright hilarious to me at this point. About four years ago I remember debating one well informed mining investor whose opinion was no legitimate mining company doesn't also supply a report using 43-101 standards. Funny how things go full circle. Water under the bridge.

It's interesting to me that you find the SEC letters surprising at all. It's the SEC's job to facilitate capital formation. When the CEO of a mining company is being ravaged by terminal cancer it's nice the SEC helps the company. I did see reference in the letters, while searching for whatever it was you were talking about, letting Guyer know he could contact the SEC mining guy. That was nice - it's also their mission to help. One might look at the SEC correspondence as kicking a dying man - I don't see it that way. A punch list isn't a bad thing, it helps add clarity.



Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.