InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 53
Posts 1042
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/22/2014

Re: wholdc post# 35956

Thursday, 12/18/2014 10:30:19 AM

Thursday, December 18, 2014 10:30:19 AM

Post# of 57515
I am not an expert, but I have read enough patents to make a common sense observation, as stated in the definition given by the USPTO, that it is not much of a stretch to go from an already regulated product such as cigarettes and alcohol, to include medications and cannibus...

It is OBVIOUS to anyone skilled in the field that EDXC cannot just build a machine and think that they can get around the ERBB patent with just the addition of a few other words...the law is specific and, imho, will protect ERBB, and Robert Tomassi, the holder of the patent.

It is my understanding that most patents include a lot of other proprietary things at other places within the body of the patent. Granted, it is the claims that spell out the bulk of what is "claimed" and protected by law.

About a lawsuit...NO one will probably sue until the time is right...as it will cost both EDXC and ERBB hundreds of thousands of dollars to either file and/or defend an infringement suit... Now, if they both have patents applied for or granted, then, this sweetens the pot...and probably will cost more money to prosecute, or defend... AJMHO, of course, FWIW