InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 54
Posts 1239
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/09/2013

Re: trglaa post# 63351

Wednesday, 11/26/2014 12:11:20 AM

Wednesday, November 26, 2014 12:11:20 AM

Post# of 142738
It's pretty simple actually. When a company does nothing more than sell stock to settle fake debt to launder money. Or sell some mystery product that can't be found anywhere including amazon or acquire fabricated shill companies(mostly because none of it is truly verifiable), it is only a matter of time before even traders are hip to a scam and the share structure reaches a level of saturation where current holders can't even sell their shares at a 99% loss because no one wants them. Take this company, even this latest acquisition of Red Foxx looks to be nothing more than a made up business plan pasted together on a free webpage builder.

This is just my opinion and would love for Chris to prove me wrong because I laid out $8K+ on his BS and still own $5K in shares between .0003 &.0004 trusting he was doing more than just selling stock or at least telling a believable enough story that would improve the value of my holdings; that, needless to say, are currently worth nothing. And I'm really not holding my breath since the ONLY thing I have seen this PUTZ do is file paperwork, put out PRs that we never hear a word of follow-up on and keep his finger firmly planted on the sell button affording zero opportunity to let it breathe:

Look at the latest gig. It's even poorly executed as a Fa sad. Neither one of the two hillbilly looking women "in charge" of Red Foxx from the Contacts page are in the "group Photo" on the website. The pictures are both very small and low res, but heck either or both, look like they could be sisters or relatives of that moron with their thinning hair and similar facial features.

The "acquired" company itself has only been registered as a business for less than 10 months, let alone conduct business for that long. Someone here said TGGI entered into a securities exchange agreement back in July. Which means the company would have to have been in discussion for at least a couple months prior to any agreements. Lets give the benefit of the doubt and assume they fast-tracked all initial elements of starting, advertising and marketing a new business; I'll be really generous and say they got it together and got their first client in 30 days, if they have any at all(although, they have one shoe in client in this whole mess since they seem to offer Business Officer "securities fraud liability" insurance, how convenient is that?). Now subtract 60 days worth of elapsed time for the initiation of "talks about parties interested in some sort of business deal". That leaves effectively 3 months worth of clients on the books before business acquisition discussions start. How many clients could a new trust based business possibly accumulate in 3 months? 3? maybe 4?.

Again, not holding my breath, and challenging Chris Clarke to do just ONE small thing to PROVE ANYTHING otherwise. I don't even care what what it is, set up a hot dog vending truck outside a home depot where I can come buy something from TGGI. Just do SOMETHING!!!