Tuesday, November 25, 2014 11:01:44 PM
I ask because obviously if he has a stake in the MCIG 3.0 I suppose we'd likely need some sort of notice of that from a legal standpoint and maybe we did and I missed it, but that would put a dent in expected revenues if we in fact expect the 3.0 sales to be all attributable to MCIG and not either cut in half as a joint-venture with Ross or with additional expenses associated with continuing royalties that Ross would get from actual sales.
Axis Technologies Group and Carbonis Forge Ahead with New Digital Carbon Credit Technology • AXTG • Apr 24, 2024 3:00 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Successful Equipment Test at Bishop Gold Mill, Inyo County, California • NBRI • Apr 23, 2024 9:41 AM
Epazz, Inc.: CryObo, Inc. solar Bitcoin operations will issue tokens • EPAZ • Apr 23, 2024 9:20 AM
Avant Technologies Launches Advanced AI Supercomputing Network and Expansive Data Solutions • AVAI • Apr 23, 2024 8:00 AM
BestGrowthStocks.com Issues Comprehensive Analysis of Triller Merger with AGBA Group Holding Limited • AGBA • Apr 22, 2024 1:00 PM
Cannabix Technologies to Present Marijuana Breathalyzer Technology at International Association for Chemical Testing (IACT) Conference in California • BLO • Apr 22, 2024 8:49 AM