AG, on why some are obsessed with the shorts. I'm obsessed with the whole damn thing. GLTU on your recent re-purchasing. I've also bought in more shares. Since the uplist, I will now be able the swing a little more with this.
Got some data from the last ½ of December 2013 where an eye on FAILS TO DELIVER data provided some explanation of the DIVE after the disappointing 10K. Not to look at shorts seems ahhh keep an eye on SHORT TRANSACTION data seems £p¢|ing stupid. More enlightenment of the data like Bruce is asking would be beneficial.
We've pointed out many other factors affecting our RISE.
scheduling then cancellations of numerous symposiums.
Semiconductor Industry Association's successful refusal to comply
Last year's govt. sequestration/shutdown.
On obsession, you're inclined to focus on your smear statements of CEO incompetency and product not commercially feasible. On the feasibility, I concur and the grants from the DoD may get us to a practical product line.
I also agree this is a highly speculative product. I have been on board with you on that for a while now. I think most of us realize we're in a gamble, big gamble.
Short data appears to have a significant bearing on our daily pps. Hence, the monitoring. To not look at the data is dismissive, actually a state of denial. Again, it's not the sole factor we/I look at. Data that follows in FAILS TO DELIVER events recorded at SEC Freeedom of Information act. From last December. We had 1.5 million Fails to Deliver Events. That's a lot in any field. FINRA still hasn't closed our complaint including this data. Why is it an obsession.
DATE QUANTITY PPS
Dec 16 17,830 0.17
Dec 17 10,307 0.18
Dec 18 20,000 0.16
Dec 19 25,000 0.17
Dec 20 488,840 0.17
Dec 23 51,513 0.14
Dec 24 813,417 0.14
Dec 26 25,000 0.15
Dec 27 28,296 0.16
Dec 30 54,760 0.15
Dec 31 38,600 0.16
1,573,563
[/quote]VR
Mike
