Dakshidin Corporation (DKSC)

[Until2020, formerly Until2017]

Where's the proof - - aside from rather loosely worded PRs and TWEETs, that any consideration has passed fro Dakshidin and any of the following { Tyburn or SCOOT or Haigh } for any product or element or aspect of SCOOT ?

I am not the one hung up here on a "minor" detail. The TWEET and the accompanying PR said this :

================================

THE TWEET on June 17, 2014 said:

"Dakshidin @Dakshidin
· Jun 17
Dakshidin Corporation Completes First Acquisition - http://nwz.se?416879nwz.se/?416879";

================================

THE PR sais this : "06/17/2014 [ACCESSWIRE]
Las Vegas, NV / ACCESSWIRE / June 17, 2014 / Dakshidin Corporation (Pink Sheets: DKSC) is pleased to announce it has concluded its first strategic asset purchase ; a state of the art proprietary electronic payment platform from The Tyburn Group Inc. based in Northern California."



================================

The TWEET on June 25, 2014 said:

"Dakshidin Corporation (Pink Sheets: DKSC) Announces the Acquisition of a Funds Transfer Platform Called “Scoot” - http://nwz.se?418316nwz.se/?418316";

================================

The PR that accompanied the July 25th tweet said this : 07/25/2014 [ACCESSWIRE]
Las Vegas, NV / ACCESSWIRE / July 24, 2014 / Dakshidin Corporation (Pink Sheets: DKSC) announces the acquisition of a funds transfer platform called "Scoot"."

================================



================================

In the six examples given above ( four in text and two images of the announcement PRs ), the language is plain and simple and pure : DAKSHIDIN HAS COMPLETED AN ACQUISITION . In the June 17th announcement it said "concluded its first strategic asset PURCHASE"

================================

THIS IS NOT A "HANGUP" about a minor detail. This is about plain meaning that indicated — that something very particular and detailed happened — "AN ACQUISITION" and "PURCHASE" . . . .

For which a consideration must be given by the purchaser and received by the seller.

================================

What was the consideration ? Who gave it ? Who received it ? Exactly when and where ? HOW MUCH WAS THE CONSIDERATION ? ( etc. )

================================

The language is clear and simple and easy to understand. I have documented it. If consideration was given, ( otherwise there would not have been a purchase ) then it would be recorded in a Quarterly Filing. by any of "Tyburn" or SCOOT" or "DAKSHIDIN" . PERIOD. CASE CLOSED ! ! !

================================

YOUR ARGUMENT IS SOPHISTRY. No proof that there was ever a purchase or an acquisition exists, except for PRs and TWEETS.

THUS, NO PURCHASE OR ACQUISITION OCCURRED.

================================

You made me do a lot of work ( above ) because you will not admit to the plain meaning of the TWEETS and PRS. Gimme a break ! ! ! !


================================

Until