InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 435
Posts 57599
Boards Moderated 5
Alias Born 01/09/2007

Re: tykundegex post# 275330

Friday, 11/21/2014 11:47:42 AM

Friday, November 21, 2014 11:47:42 AM

Post# of 312012
3 separate issues

RH doesn't have to seat a BoD if he has no intent of uplisting P2O
(indy BoD is the signal for the *PROs* to actually have to undertake
a partially laddered cover on 5 years' aggregate efforts re: PTOI)

that is why in mid 2012 i noted *then* 3 outcomes
one of which i removed with RH's investment of 2013

imo flagship not only works .. but has buyer/s so i will totally disagree
re: buyout .. but clearly as i articulated in my post >> anyone can
put a pricetag in of their choosing

$i used $250M .. others may use $50M or $500M

it's no secret based on my DD that this sector is emerging (ie ascending)
and has at a minimum a decade of *growth* within it .. making the
successful early adopter (ie best of breed) worth *investing* in
from my perspective

lastly i've noted a sequence of material events out of mgmt that can't
be misinterpreted by anyone

imo intent of mgmt will be known *shortly* after first prox sale is 8k'd

if there is no indy BoD seated .. imo *buyout* is en route (pubco/private)

if there is an indy BoD seated .. uplisting comes to pass in 2015

either way works for this P2O investor .. my CB is sub 20c re: PTOI
and i currently hold 6x more *markers* than i did a mere 2 years ago

i am totally cognizant of my risk reward when it comes to disruptive techs
in emerging sectors

and i'm not alone in that thinking ..

ACC executive summary from Oct 2014 .. comes to mind .. :)


http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=107032795

you have a good one

4kids
all jmo






10/5/07 -- there are no coincidences here ...
oh and like many other longs .. not selling at this level --