InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 25
Posts 1201
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/12/2014

Re: centurycom post# 4939

Tuesday, 11/18/2014 11:03:41 AM

Tuesday, November 18, 2014 11:03:41 AM

Post# of 8287
From what I remember most cases want cases dismissed. One of them was different and tried wrong jurisdiction. Now if wrong jurisdiction ain't an admittance of quilt I don't know what is (since the rest of the patent lawyers are trying for dismissals).

It's all trying to con a judge that knows nothing about technology to agree that one's new paper (like settlers) is greater than the existing rule (tribes, unable to speak the language)... obviously its the power that smashes the bugs and too bad, can't do anything about it.

How can one come up with a patent doing the same thing as another patent and then be upheld in court? TILT factor just easier to dismiss the case? What is their line of thinking? A patent clerk awarding a patent because he thinks one covering is out for Bankrupt company? I don't think they think. It's up to the filer to do preexisting patents. How can the court say in over lapping patents that it is dismissed? Lazy do what they want to do, Federal Judges, that don't want their Holidays or vacations messed with? Probably TILT factor, easier to dismiss and go back to who needs a search warrant today...

Okay, so lots of risk, and organizations (Frats) and alumni are very important in chosing the right lawyer for the right judge. At least have one on the team. :D