Evaluating A Companys Capital Structure
For stock investors that favor companies with good fundamentals, a strong balance sheet is an important consideration for investing in a companys stock. The strength of a companys balance sheet can be evaluated by three broad categories of investment-quality measurements: working capital adequacy, asset performance and capital structure. In this article, well look at evaluating balance sheet strength based on the composition of a companys capital structure.
A companys capitalization (not to be confused with market capitalization) describes the composition of a companys permanent or long-term capital, which consists of a combination of debt and equity. A healthy proportion of equity capital, as opposed to debt capital, in a companys capital structure is an indication of financial fitness.
Clarifying Capital Structure Related Terminology
The equity part of the debt-equity relationship is the easiest to define. In a companys capital structure, equity consists of a companys common and preferred stock plus retained earnings, which are summed up in the shareholders equity account on a balance sheet. This invested capital and debt, generally of the long-term variety, comprises a companys capitalization, i.e. a permanent type of funding to support a companys growth and related assets.
A discussion of debt is less straightforward. Investment literature often equates a companys debt with its liabilities. Investors should understand that there is a difference between operational and debt liabilities - it is the latter that forms the debt component of a companys capitalization - but thats not the end of the debt story.
Among financial analysts and investment research services, there is no universal agreement as to what constitutes a debt liability. For many analysts, the debt component in a companys capitalization is simply a balance sheets long-term debt. This definition is too simplistic. Investors should stick to a stricter interpretation of debt where the debt component of a companys capitalization should consist of the following: short-term borrowings (notes payable), the current portion of long-term debt, long-term debt, two-thirds (rule of thumb) of the principal amount of operating leases and redeemable preferred stock. Using a comprehensive total debt figure is a prudent analytical tool for stock investors.
Its worth noting here that both international and U.S. financial accounting standards boards are proposing rule changes that would treat operating leases and pension projected-benefits as balance sheet liabilities. The new proposed rules certainly alert investors to the true nature of these off-balance sheet obligations that have all the earmarks of debt.
Is There an Optimal Debt-Equity Relationship?
In financial terms, debt is a good example of the proverbial two-edged sword. Astute use of leverage (debt) increases the amount of financial resources available to a company for growth and expansion. The assumption is that management can earn more on borrowed funds than it pays in interest expense and fees on these funds. However, as successful as this formula may seem, it does require that a company maintain a solid record of complying with its various borrowing commitments.
A company considered too highly leveraged (too much debt versus equity) may find its freedom of action restricted by its creditors and/or may have its profitability hurt as a result of paying high interest costs. Of course, the worst-case scenario would be having trouble meeting operating and debt liabilities during periods of adverse economic conditions. Lastly, a company in a highly competitive business, if hobbled by high debt, may find its competitors taking advantage of its problems to grab more market share .
Unfortunately, there is no magic proportion of debt that a company can take on. The debt-equity relationship varies according to industries involved, a companys line of business and its stage of development. However, because investors are better off putting their money into companies with strong balance sheets, common sense tells us that these companies should have, generally speaking, lower debt and higher equity levels.
Capital Ratios and Indicators
In general, analysts use three different ratios to assess the financial strength of a companys capitalization structure. The first two, the so-called debt and debt/equity ratios, are popular measurements; however, its the capitalization ratio that delivers the key insights to evaluating a companys capital position.
The debt ratio compares total liabilities to total assets . Obviously, more of the former means less equity and, therefore, indicates a more leveraged position. The problem with this measurement is that it is too broad in scope, which, as a consequence, gives equal weight to operational and debt liabilities. The same criticism can be applied to the debt/equity ratio, which compares total liabilities to total shareholders equity. Current and non-current operational liabilities, particularly the latter, represent obligations that will be with the company forever. Also, unlike debt, there are no fixed payments of principal or interest attached to operational liabilities.
The capitalization ratio (total debt/total capitalization) compares the debt component of a companys capital structure (the sum of obligations categorized as debt + total shareholders equity) to the equity component. Expressed as a percentage, a low number is indicative of a healthy equity cushion, which is always more desirable than a high percentage of debt.
Additional Evaluative Debt-Equity Considerations
Companies in an aggressive acquisition mode can rack up a large amount of purchased goodwill in their balance sheets. Investors need to be alert to the impact of intangibles on the equity component of a companys capitalization. A material amount of intangible assets need to be considered carefully for its potential negative effect as a deduction (or impairment) of equity, which, as a consequence, will adversely affect the capitalization ratio.
Funded debt is the technical term applied to the portion of a companys long-term debt that is made up of bonds and other similar long-term, fixed-maturity types of borrowings. No matter how problematic a companys financial condition may be, the holders of these obligations cannot demand payment as long the company pays the interest on its funded debt. In contrast, bank debt is usually subject to acceleration clauses and/or covenants that allow the lender to call its loan. From the investors perspective, the greater the percentage of funded debt to total debt disclosed in the debt note in the notes to financial statements, the better. Funded debt gives a company more wiggle room.
Lastly, credit ratings are formal risk evaluations by credit-rating agencies - Moodys, Standard & Poors, Duff & Phelps and Fitch – of a companys ability to repay principal and interest on debt obligations, principally bonds and commercial paper. Here again, this information should appear in the footnotes. Obviously, investors should be glad to see high-quality rankings on the debt of companies they are considering as investment opportunities and be wary of the reverse.
The Bottom Line
A companys reasonable, proportional use of debt and equity to support its assets is a key indicator of balance sheet strength. A healthy capital structure that reflects a low level of debt and a corresponding high level of equity is a very positive sign of investment quality.
