InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 6
Posts 2102
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/19/2010

Re: Paulness post# 8908

Friday, 10/24/2014 2:53:41 PM

Friday, October 24, 2014 2:53:41 PM

Post# of 9405
Yes, I realize that NASA needs to approve any such licensing that Nanobeak has arranged.

Originally "MSGI is forming a number of majority owned subsidiaries, each of which will hold the rights to a specific technology ". Nanobeak became the subsidiary that holds the sensor technology rights which as I understood it included not only medical diagnostic. Correct? That medical diagnostic license was licensed out to VNTH via Nanobeak's relationship with NASA and to that other company via VNTH sub-license.

So, my point is why, with the permission of NASA, couldn't the other uses of the technology be licensed to other company(s) via Nanobeak's agreement with NASA?

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.