InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 55
Posts 6643
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/20/2011

Re: Myth post# 32457

Wednesday, 10/22/2014 2:35:58 PM

Wednesday, October 22, 2014 2:35:58 PM

Post# of 74415
Had SEDAR accepted the unaudited fins with an attorneys letter as the OTC had, it would have been just fine. As a representative from SEDAR stated to someone else on this board, companies do it all the time. It was worth the effort and would have saved the expense of the audit should it have been accepted.

The A/S may or may not have been needed had the CTO not dropped at the opportune time that it did. That we do not know. However, since it followed the CTO, it may have created that need.

As a gr8 CEO would do though, Ed has taken lemons and has been turning them to lemonade. The increase did look like it was needed and many of the few SEGI stockholders (at least all of the ones I have conversations with) were in agreement that the A/S would be a good thing and was needed.

Sounds to me like the CEO is on top of things to me.

big smile SEGI