InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 32
Posts 6198
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/16/2008

Re: None

Wednesday, 10/15/2014 9:33:03 AM

Wednesday, October 15, 2014 9:33:03 AM

Post# of 119176
Much too quiet here, hence, food for thought:

From the Deposition of Chad Coats in the Process case:

"At no time did I or anyone else acting on behalf of AHS and HTI
represent that HTI exclusively owned all the intellectual property rights in the products that were the subject of the Purchase Contract." [Purchase Contract refers to the contract with Process
to manufacture parts for the Hy-Impact unit[s} about June 2012]

So - the question remains - Who owns the IP rights to Hy-Impact units.

I do not believe that the IP in question is patented or trademarked.