you cant say forget the source and listen to the message - the source is part of the message and the TRACK RECORD of the source is PART of the MESSAGE
when the "source" cant get the obvious then their credibility becomes ZERO
and then the message however accurate, eloquent, insightful, or realistic it might be is SHIT
because their credibility is ZERO
If one cannot see the obvious (No 3rd term for Maliki) and even after the naming of the PM insists it may still not be over then hey, who gives a shit what they have to say?
THEY MISSED THE OBVIOUS IRAQ 101 PREDICTION A NOVICE COULD MAKE!
WHY SHOULD THEY NOW HAVE GREATER INSIGHTS ON SOMETHING EVEN MORE COMPLEX?
When my time on earth is gone, and my activities here are passed, I want they bury me upside down, and my critics can kiss my ass!
Robert Montgomery Knight - The General