InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 37
Posts 1455
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/06/2014

Re: Krysti post# 41845

Wednesday, 09/17/2014 2:45:31 PM

Wednesday, September 17, 2014 2:45:31 PM

Post# of 68821
Glad we agree. So you assume that the patents have no merit is the argument?
I surmise the patents do have merit and the resources needed to prove it against a stacked deck are enormous. The scheme more times than not lies with the big powerful corporations that use other peoples ideas to benefit their wealthy stockholders at the expense of the small guy. Does that make it a Ponzi scheme or just a struggling company with a fabulous idea and no resources to accomplish the goal. You have no way of proving if those patents are being infringed on or not. None of us do. If Ali and Ron are capable of concocting multiple schemes to keep this afloat year after year so be it. As I stated before the limited resources and possible gains outweigh the risk for most here. Anyway who are you to determine how someone gets paid? If it's within the scope of the law and the person investing understands the risk why should anyone care how Ron and Ali make their living. Quite frankly they are erect and viable which is more than I can say for a large part of this society as a whole. You think anyone here cares if there is a revolving door here? NO WE all know it. called trading some make good trades some make poor ones. Your mission for the last 5 years will solve nothing.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.