InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 30
Posts 418
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/24/2014

Re: None

Wednesday, 09/10/2014 12:41:40 PM

Wednesday, September 10, 2014 12:41:40 PM

Post# of 6062
Sadly you are wrong.

If you read my post, I said:

Analysts recommend price targets all the time that are lot higher in price than the current valuation. I have suggested price targets in that range, which I have subsequently adjusted as the year has gone on.

But I have always been careful to illustrate why I think the company deserves a specific valuation. You may disagree with me but that doesn't mean there isn't a rationale for my position.

Let's be honest. I wasn't the one on this board saying ".50" you are confusing me with another poster who is no longer active. And that individual did post daily that this stock was going to .50. People tend to be very passionate about stocks when they have a lot of money invested.



http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=105990062

I never said I didn't suggest a .50 price target at one point. I said that I wasn't the one posting on this board a .50 price target. I offered numerous price targets for different scenarios.

Things aren't always so simple. But nice try.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.