InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 45
Posts 2138
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/08/2011

Re: Village_Pub post# 8736

Thursday, 08/21/2014 9:25:49 PM

Thursday, August 21, 2014 9:25:49 PM

Post# of 9405
I think the stock willbe in play....

very soon. That was a plea bargain, plain and simple,

so he can get shut of the issues with Plummer.

I find it offensive that this F Plummer gets a few

years in club Fed while delaying or creating disaster

for hundreds of shareholders...for moronic greed that

probably succeeded because Jeremy was desperate for a

tranche of cash and a partnership to make the solar work.

Makes me want to vomit and to condemn Barbera, who fer chrissake

may have been desperate for funding but after the decade in the

database/ticketing industry, should have known better.


I think the real question is whether Barbera

was a rube or of he was in cahoots, and if it was

provable. I don't think it was provable unless

Plummer, with what nonexistent credibility that he had,

said anything or provided any reason to believe

that Barbera was colluding with him when he made announcements

about the Franklin BS. If that had been the case,

we might have seen more of a *"Pete Rose" ban,

but we did not.

If the 2 years you claim were to really happen,

"NaNose" would have the edge, but I don't think

Buckman would allow that. I like his mettle and

appreciate his academic sensibilities and achievements.


My very best guess, based on all the public data

provided, is a reverse merge into Nanobeak, primarily

because it would be the best way to preserve

all long shareholders' interests (and convertible noteholders who

are now shareholders), and allow a perfectly fine holding company

to remain.

msgi long...

SD

*who looks like he's losing the battle to creeping obesity, yikes

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.