InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 32
Posts 6198
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/16/2008

Re: None

Tuesday, 08/19/2014 7:52:24 PM

Tuesday, August 19, 2014 7:52:24 PM

Post# of 119176
From a 12 page brief filed by HTI/AHS on or about Aug 14.
CV-2013-1050 I think it interesting but it still leads me to question why Process Electronics took HTI/AHS to court for Breach of Contract as there was nothing for them to manufacture.

page 7 "even Plaintiff [Process} acknowledges that neither HTI nor AHS has yet "successfully developed a market for their technology" as it is still undergoing testing."

page 9 "at minimum, the question of ownership of the intellectual property is very much in dispute."

page 11/12 AFFIDAVIT of CHARLTON COATS

#2 "at no time did I or anyone else acting on behalf of AHS or HTI represent that HTI exclusively owned all of the intellectual property rights that were the subject of the Purchase Contract
{with Process}."

Referring to the quote from page 9, very interesting imo.