Wednesday, July 30, 2014 12:03:57 AM
Quite obviously, there is no evidence of tortious interference as, if there was, a lawsuit would have been filed long, long ago alleging that to be the case. Any responsible CEO would have done so. In fact, a CEO's fiduciary responsibility would have required them to do so.
** Bear in mind that relating a fact or facts to a customer which results in the customer severing business ties with another is NOT tortious interference. Just keep that little nugget in the back of your head for future reference.
"Libenter homines id quod volunt credunt"
FEATURED Cannabix's Breath Logix Alcohol Device Delivers Positive Impact to Private Monitoring Agency in Montana, USA • Apr 25, 2024 8:52 AM
Bantec Reports an Over 50 Percent Increase in Sales and Profits in Q1 2024 from Q1 2023 • BANT • Apr 25, 2024 10:00 AM
Kona Gold Beverages, Inc. Announces Name Change to NuVibe, Inc. and Initiation of Ticker Symbol Application Process • KGKG • Apr 25, 2024 8:30 AM
Axis Technologies Group and Carbonis Forge Ahead with New Digital Carbon Credit Technology • AXTG • Apr 24, 2024 3:00 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Successful Equipment Test at Bishop Gold Mill, Inyo County, California • NBRI • Apr 23, 2024 9:41 AM
Epazz, Inc.: CryObo, Inc. solar Bitcoin operations will issue tokens • EPAZ • Apr 23, 2024 9:20 AM