Here is a note I have received from one of the posts on this thread:
(Perhaps those investigating these mysterious deaths in the banking segment should just not aim interested to the parties where the information was published when it is "public domain"? Hmmm?
Statement Made:
"We have been notified that one of your posts infringed on the intellectual property rights of the owner (wallstreetonparade.com) and the offending post has been taken down pursuant to their notice.
Please refrain from violating the property rights of others when posting content on iHub.
It is usually acceptable to post a link and a synopsis or summary of the content, but you should not copy/paste the third-party content in its entirety.
As far as my legal background takes me . . .this article is "public interest" which is "public domain". There is nothing on that thread revealing anything different. Copyright does not mean that one cannot copy and paste without identifying the source. Copyright means that the PRINT is protected from being plagiarized or altered in any way shape or form from its' original intent. Sources must always be identified. That particular source will now be ostracized by this researcher and investigative reporter.
Peace,
Mark
Economics by Following the Money ~ Globally & Nationally on Twitter @Conan644
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.