InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 57
Posts 12107
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/26/2011

Re: Meeechigan21 post# 121814

Wednesday, 07/23/2014 1:40:02 PM

Wednesday, July 23, 2014 1:40:02 PM

Post# of 148373
Did the Ad Agency drop Scott/SEEK?

If for some reason Scott was dropped by Televisionadgroup. Was it because he violated the Terms and Conditions?

Yeah, think about it Mojo. They spent all that time producing the commercial, they announced the commericals began a month ago, the ad agency told many of us that they were a paid client. It is obvious that the ad agency request SG to tell shareholders that he is not working with them anymore so they don't receive anymore phone calls. It is probably effecting their business and I'm sure they are completely sick of being asked the same question everyday since June 1st



Something else to think about

Now what was the reason the public was blowing up the Ad Agency's phone in the 1st place?

The Ads were supposed to roll out June 1st, they didn't and Scott was silent for over 10 days.


After all of the news released so far, filing with the SEC again, 1st and 2nd quarter numbers, Call Center News, TV ads starting....why on earth is this PPS trading well under its 52 week high of .0077

IMO, it appears as though the Market is focusing on the CEO actions and not Anything, Everything, Anyone and Everyone else....
How many times did Scott's name come up when People called about the No Show TV ads? How did this make one of Televisionadgroups clients look?

If Scott would've responded in a timely most of the Televisionadgroups calls could have been avoided IMO.

IMO People called Televsionadgroup because they couldn't get answers from Scott.

Look at all the Real Question Facebook posts Scott deleted about the TV ads

At what point does the CEO get held responsible?

IMO SEEK Distractions aren't working.....just check the current PPS :(