InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5213
Posts 24013
Boards Moderated 5
Alias Born 09/20/2000

Re: None

Monday, 06/23/2014 9:30:05 AM

Monday, June 23, 2014 9:30:05 AM

Post# of 52323
UNGS vs ERBB**Compare & Contrast…

Please, I have to humbly ask that anyone reading this post, please understand that this is in no way a knock about ERBB (American Green) and anything going on with their operations. This post is not made to ”devalue” the operations of ERBB. This post that I am making is to show how we could possibly ”value the new operations of UNGS and show how UNGS could very possibly be significantly undervalued based on creating a ”Compare & Contrast” post between UNGS and a company that is utilizing the same operational concept with their kiosk machines that UNGS will be utilizing within the Marijuana Industry to help to be able to gage where UNGS could very likely trade upon completion of the Signifi Solutions, Inc. acquisition.

Please understand that the share price of both UNGS and ERBB will fluctuate on a regular basis. Because of this, please use the substitution Property to substitute out any variable that might change later in the future with either of the companies. I will create the baseline of this post from the last trading day of this past Friday, 20 Jun 2014 to create a Market Cap Analysis:

** ERBB Share Price = .0243
** UNGS Share Price = .0026

** ERBB Outstanding Shares (OS) = 3,851,572,678
http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/ERBB/profile
** UNGS Outstanding Shares (OS) = 576,332,181
http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/UNGS/profile

** ERBB Market Cap = $93,593,216
** UNGS Market Cap = $1,498,464

Just by considering the above Market Cap Analysis between both ERBB and UNGSUNGS is approximately 62 times cheaper or smaller than where ERBB exists. This means that it could be justified for UNGS to be trading 62 times higher than its current price of .0026 per share. That would approximately equate to… .16+ per share as the value for where UNGS could fundamentally exist to trade; conservatively speaking. From what I’m hearing, the company is not going to do a reverse split. This means that the OS could double or so as an option as there are enough shares in the company's treasury of shares in its Authorized Shares (AS) kitty to secure/close the deal. Or… maybe the OS could remain the same if Preferred Shares are used to capture the controlling interest to consummate the deal instead of common shares. Again, this is why I have to stress to use the Substitution Property to substitute any variable above that might change at any particular time.



To further ”Compare & Contrast”… the UNGS/Sylios Corp. (Signifi Solutions, Inc.) kiosk machines look like they are going to be far better than the kiosk machines of ERBB (American Green). See below:

Website - UNGS/Sylios Corp. (Signifi Solutions, Inc.)
http://www.signifi.com/

Website - ERBB (American Green).
http://www.americangreen.com/

To add, see the Client List for Signifi Solutions, Inc. below:


http://www.signifi.com/







To further add…

This Florida (FL) Secretary of State (SOS) name change was the first piece of the name change that administratively needed to first be done:
http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail/EntityName/domp-p08000032840-d80f9a01-a54b-493b-9c43-de59344a0883/sylios/Page1

UNGS changing its name at the FL SOS from US Natural Gas Corp to Sylios Corp was subliminally a huge step in the right direction. It's consistent to what was PR-ed a while ago back on Apr 30, 2014 about UNGS being acquired by Signifi Solutions, Inc. and with what was filed with OTC Markets under NOTE Q – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS of their March 31, 2014 Unaudited Quarterly Report below:
http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&article=62025057

This transaction is expected to be completed within 90 days from the release of that PR above released on April 30, 2014 so that would give us an impact date of anytime up to July 30, 2014, speculatively speaking give or take some days if I had to guess. Any significant update could carry UNGS a long ways in short order even before the impact date.

What I liked too within the recently released PR was that the Company will launch two new corporate websites.

** The parent Company website will be available on June 30, 2014 at:
http://www.sylios.com/

** The Company will also launch a retail website for its new medical and recreational marijuana subsidiary, (The Greater Cannabis Company) on or before July 15, 2014 at:
http://www.greatercannabiscompany.com

When I first read the initial PR regarding this deal, one of the first things I did was call Source Capital Group, Inc. to confirm if the deal was real since they are the Advisers of this deal to Signifi. They confirmed that the deal was very real:
http://www.sourcegrp.com/

UNGS now have received approval from FINRA of their name change as indicative from their recent PR below:
http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&article=62628106



Again… Bottom line, my point is that if ERBB is trading at .0243 per share with on OS of 3.8 Billion shares and a Float of over 3 Billion shares, then UNGS should not be trading here at .0026 per share with an OS and Float that is significantly lower. In my opinion, UNGS definitely should be trading somewhere much higher after considering the justification I used to Compare & Contrast as explained above.

v/r
Sterling

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.