InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 23
Posts 4310
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/15/2009

Re: Trum post# 106866

Saturday, 04/19/2014 7:53:34 AM

Saturday, April 19, 2014 7:53:34 AM

Post# of 123597
Except for YOUR OPINION, based on what some stock did in the past with "getting a lawyer to 'lift restrictions on some note"
YOU HAVE NOT PROVIDED ANY EVIDENCE OF ANYBODY "DUMPING".
(be it SHORTS, INSIDERS or ANYONE ELSE)

You don't believe the shorts are doing it, so you came up with this other story to explain the huge volume.

You are wrong about Who got the 'note" (it was a golden handshake for Pino), therefore, he is no longer in control, and could no longer get a lawyer to take off the restrictions.
Why do you think it was not disclosed until AFTER PINO RESIGNED, even though it was "dated" Feb. It was a "safety net" for the NEW MANAGEMENT to ensure EVERYTHING WAS HANDED OVER and NO MORE SURPRISES (like to 4M lawsuit).


The only thing you've managed to prove is John Banks has a company call Rich Capital International (in England) BIG DEAL