retired but keeping my sense of humor
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Stokd
15m
$NLST Apparently some think that we're going to stay at the current price till all CAFC appeals are concluded. With many catalysts to come as verdicts/rulings/trials—even though we need to wait for the CAFC till we can collect—there is no way we don't run quite a bit as we gradually get these wins under our belt.
I would add that as things progress in Netlist's favor, the possibility of deals/settlements remains and could tip the balance in negotiations prior to CAFC conclusions.
Remember, that the negative aspects of our litigation situation is the PTAB, and with mostly all key patent IPRs being concluded, most of the bad news is in the rear view mirror.
Another thought is that there is no way that any investor would stay if they thought the only upside is in 2 years—it is just venting frustration or trying to affect sentiment to capitalize IMO—because they know like the rest of us that there are plenty of opportunity here prior to conclusion of appeals.
sounds like a plan but in the world of otc there is no way they would let us hold a 4.5 pps!!! in theory your plan is the move. but the reality is if we think we're crying now, we'd be stroking out one by one and there wouldnt be enough ambulances to get to all of us in time !!!
they lost to begin with for starters. no jdla, no license. how much they get racked for is another story. my 2 cents!
all depends on whether the entity is long term or short. long we're winners.
business as usual after the call and getting better, time for the pps to rebound again lol !!!
Stokd $NLST I hope folks understand, that with Gilstrap's order and reasoning yesterday to not stay or sever the 912 from the Micron 294 case, and to proceed with trial regardless of the PTAB IPR decision... it essentially clears any uncertainty regarding the Samsung 293 trial—which is on same patents—also not being stayed or severed, and I assume will be scheduled for the next available date once the BOC trial is over.
I also wonder if/how his reasoning may impact his decision whether to proceed with the stayed and ready for trial Micron 203 case involving the 918/054/060/160 patents.
NLST Plaintiff (Netlist) Oppostion to Samsung's Renewed Motion to Stay the #463 Case. Filed Yesterday. Only Available, so far, on Pacer. I'll post the pertinent pages in the comments.
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_570809121.jpg
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_570809193.jpg
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_570809642.jpg
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_570809788.jpg
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_570809915.jpg
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_570810056.jpg
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_570810552.jpg
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_570810725.jpg
NLST Indefinitely delaying the enforcement of the jury's findings in favor of the PTAB proceedings
at this point would be unjust and inefficient. Once the remaining two motions in this case are resolved,
Samsung can appeal the jury's verdict to the Federal Circuit just as Netlist plans to appeal the PTAB's
findings of invalidity. At that point, the Federal Circuit will be able to decide the outstanding issues in
each case with the benefit of the full record from both actions should it so choose. This is plainly the
most just and efficient course of action. Samsung's proposed stay, on the other hand, would deprive
the Federal Circuit of the opportunity to decide when and how to review these judgments and further,
would conceal the jury's findings of infringement, validity, and willfulness from the record, along with
any contradictory representations Samsung made in this Court and before the PTAB. This is not the
purpose of a stay and this Court should not delay its final decision
not exactly my interpretation as these are Jason Sheasby’s words in arguement for why a delay makes no sense.
low vol bs......means nothing.....
just went back up !!! oh and yeah, one of these days !!!
lol!!! gotta call an audible, we'll be ok.......
8-K Current report filing Apr 25, 2024 https://investors.netlist.com/websites/netlist/English/3200/us-sec-filings.html
NETLIST REPORTS FIRST QUARTER 2024 RESULTS https://investors.netlist.com/websites/netlist/English/2120/us-press-release.html?airportNewsID=26328209-40ec-4873-8a47-bdf2b29269ff
good luck on the earning report and cc today. be back later, hope for the best, forget the rest.
NLST Ooh people, the first 3 weeks of May is going to be extremely Busy but most importantly promising for Netlist:
1st week : SS BOC Pre Trial
2nd week: SS BOC Trial
3rd week : Micron Trial (912)
—————
Also awaiting Gilstrap :
continuing Micron trial (339,506,918)
SS Royalties - post BOC Trial
SS (912) Trial - post BOC Trial
SK Hynix Logs Fastest Sales Growth Since 2010
NLST SK Hynix to invest $3.86 bln in DRAM chip production in South Korea
https://www.reuters.com/technology/sk-hynix-invest-386-bln-dram-chip-production-base-south-korea-2024-04-24/
NLST Samsung Starts Mass Production of 9th Generation V-NAND: 1Tb 3D TLC NAND
https://www.anandtech.com/show/21365/samsung-starts-mass-production-of-9th-generation-vnand-1tb-3d-tlc-nand
NLST PC memory gets faster, safer with new DDR5 standard
https://www.pcworld.com/article/2312798/pc-memory-gets-faster-safer-with-new-ddr5-standard.html
Stokd $NLST Netlist filed their opposition to Samsung's renewed stay motion in the 463 case—whose $303mil win is now in post trial awaiting a ruling on Samsung's JMOL and Netlist's Ongoing Royalty.
Unfortunately, after updating (careful⚠️) Recap few weeks ago—which allows me to make any doc I pay for publicly accessible—it has not worked once. When I first downloaded it took a month to work, so perhaps it takes some time, but for now I can't make it accessible and link for others.
Some have posted parts already, I'll post the Introduction, maybe others can fill in the rest of the pages...Doc 598. 🙏🏼🍻🙏🏼
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_570748555.png
NLST Reading the latest court doc (opposed motion to stay from JS) and love this part......
"Indefinitely delaying the enforcement of the jury’s findings in favor of the PTAB proceedings at this point would be unjust and inefficient. Once the remaining two motions in this case are resolved, Samsung can appeal the jury’s verdict to the Federal Circuit just as Netlist plans to appeal the PTAB’s
findings of invalidity. At that point, the Federal Circuit will be able to decide the outstanding issues in each case with the benefit of the full record from both actions should it so choose..."
robcobb
26m
$NLST I have been going to all the hearings ,pre trials,Samsung trial and soon to be Micron trial for around two years now.Everything I have witnessed with Judge Gilstrap is that he tries to maneuver all the litigation in a way (fairly to both sides)where the jury after (hearing all the experts and evidence)has to make the decision on whether the patents have been infringed or not,and does not like to stay a case. His time is to precious with all the cases on his calendar!I have said in the past I think Judge Gilstrap is an honorable man and I stand by that! I think not severing the 912 (after the ptab ruling)from the 294 case proves that along with many other rulings he has made over the course of the Nlst cases! I am getting very anxious about attending the Micron trial on May 20 and will report to the best of my ability,along with Bolliver ,and maybe Prime 311.I think we will give a good picture of what happens! Hopefully some enlightenment from Chuck tomorrow.
NLST For DD: The word Daubert has been mentioned as one of the reason why the stay is denied.
The “Daubert Standard” provides a systematic framework for a trial court judge to assess the reliability and relevance of expert witness testimony before it is presented to a jury. Established in the 1993 U.S. Supreme Court case Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), this standard transformed the landscape of expert testimony by placing the responsibility on trial judges to act as "gatekeepers" of scientific evidence.
Stokd
33m
$NLST 🔥🔥🔥 Gilstrap DENIED Micron's motion to Stay or Sever the 912 in the 294 case and firmly SET trial for May 20!!!
Micron... your train has arrived!!!
Link to full doc below---4 pages worth a read. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.txed.216365/gov.uscourts.txed.216365.112.0.pdf
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_570733270.png
"Micron is to secure a replacement expert with sufficient qualifications who will wholly adopt each of Dr. Stone’s reports and opinions who will testify in person during the May 20, 2024 trial setting by “stepping into the shoes” of Dr. Stone. The Court made it clear during the telephonic hearing on April 23, 2024, that in no event would the Court allow the retention by Micron of a new technical expert who would not wholly adopt and be limited to Dr. Stone’s opinions and reports. Said another way, the Court made it clear that Micron would not be allowed to conduct new technical testing and analysis via a replacement expert for Dr. Stone"
1. Motion for Continuance (Dkt. No. 101) -> " In sum, Micron will proceed with Dr. Stone as a live witness, or it will replace Dr. Stone with another expert who will wholly adopt—and be limited to—Dr. Stone’s opinions and reports; and it must do one or the other in time to go forward with trial on May 20, 2024"
2. Motion to Stay or, Alternatively, Sever and Stay the Asserted ’912 Patent, in View of Final Written Decision of Invalidity (Dkt. No. 93) -> Consequently, the Motion to Stay or, Alternatively, Sever and Stay the Asserted ’912 Patent (Dkt. No. 93) is DENIED.
yes you are correct i got them mixed up being in the same column and stuff, yes its that 136 that has the ptab validated stuff. which now makes me think those idiots at micron get pslab to re review it by then and make them unpatentable. not being negative either. i can already see the delays coming, just wondering how far they go this time ? i dont even want to watch this trainwreck anymore lol !!!
YAY!!!
correction, 628 case. the one with all the ptab VALIDATED claims and no judge, sorry for the confusion...
yes but thats for the 608 case, which is ready to go, just needs a judge and then 3 days before the trial date they'll have a reason to delay it, yeah man the american dream!!!! excuse me while i kiss the sky........
yup, i'm waiting on the next excuse as i type......and they seem to be getting more elaborate every time. enough is enough......
TOMKiLA
47m
$NLST Here is the increase in GB of hbm in 2024 and 2025!
Remember that netlist got $16 per unit of stolen hbm and each hbm has on average 8/16 gb.
So the data to use is 1 or 2$ per GB.
In 2024 alone, 1.2 billion GB HBM is expected.
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_570633094.png
Stokd $NLST ***Our ever-changing landscape***
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_570620141.png
Stokd $NLST We got the minutes from today's Scheduling/Management Conference in the Micron 628 case.
"Minute Entry for proceedings held before District Judge Rodney Gilstrap: Scheduling Conference/Case Management Conference held on 4/23/2024 from 02:01 PM to 02:09 PM. Counsel for the parties appeared and were asked by the Court if any modifications needed to be made to the Discovery Order and/or Docket Control Order and whether there was a need for the entry of a Protective Order. Counsel to notify the Court within three business days of the name of an agreed upon mediator. If no agreement is reached, the Court will appoint a mediator. Docket Control Order: Court modified (1) Defendant designate expert witnesses from March 31, 2025 to April 7, 2025; and (2) Deadline to file motions to compel from March 31, 2025 to April 7, 2025. The parties to submit a proposed Discovery Order and joint Protective Order for the Court's consideration within three business days."
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_570605541.png
gm gdog, you dont have to be sorry your not the one who has to show responsibility and face the music !
i'm not the gullible type but it sure fooled me. this is criminal as far as i am concerned. wheres the balance ? i got covid, i had a stroke, my witness's wife is dying. it has now come to my attention that they really dont ever have to go to court. i wonder what the next excuse will be..........
ok you got a deal but no lawyers !!!
Stokd
56m
$NLST The minutes from the Micron 294 case Telephone Conference were released. And I would caution relying to much on the new date of May 20th, of course I hope it sticks but Gilstrap's wording—"intends to continue"—is different from just continued and reset.
Meaning, IMO, they set a tentative date in hopes that things can get worked out by then, but it is not definitive... only intended and reset for now. Just want to avoid any more needles volatility in price action and with emotions.
"Minute Entry for proceedings held before District Judge Rodney Gilstrap: Telephonic Conference held on 4/23/2024. Court opened and counsel were identified. Discussion held re: Dkt. No. 101 and responsive filings thereto. Court intends to continue case from its April 29, 2024 trial setting to be reset for the week of May 20, 2024."
https://sih-st-charts.stocktwits-cdn.com/production/original_570589729.png