MXOM revoked:

https://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2016/34-78878.pdf

MXOM SEC Suspension for severely delinquent Financials / Filings:

https://www.sec.gov/litigation/suspensions/2016/34-78731.pdf

Order:

https://www.sec.gov/litigation/suspensions/2016/34-78731-o.pdf

Admin Proceeding:

https://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2016/34-78732.pdf

Second alert on MXOM being severely delinquent in filing Financials and is at extreme risk of an SEC Suspension and subsequent stock registration revocation. The last 10Q was in 2014.

https://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/browse-edgar?company=Pan+American+Goldfields&owner=exclude&action=getcompany

MXOM is on the list of delinquent filers:

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=123772332

1454 SEC Filers have been Suspended by the SEC for Financials delinquencies. The SEC Administrative Law Judge subsequently revoked the Registrations of each delinquent SEC Filer.

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=123541685

New management http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&article=71074501&symbol=MXOM

What's going on with this stock? Is Mxom still a viable company? No real trading or news in over a year. Now a lot of trading in the last few weeks. Can anyone shed some light on this? Thanks

..................

$MXOM .006

Nice alert... Thanks

MXOM is severely delinquent in filing their Financials and corporate filing obligations to the SEC. On Feb. 20, 2015 the SEC suspended 8 stocks from the Delinquent SEC Filers list, and it is likely that more delinquent Filers will be suspended.

Since Jan 1st, 2010 the SEC has suspended over 1290 stocks for Financials delinquencies. All of those Suspended stocks had their stock registrations revoked.

Shareholders should contact the company and pressure the Mgmt to file their delinquent Financials because ALL shareholders would be wiped out IF the SEC suspends the stock.

MXOM is on the list of delinquent filers:

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=110680509

Disaster... even lost the trading tier... idiots (sad to say)!!!

How are things going at Pan American?

Playing over in the BAA sandbox instead.

Yeah, your not kidding. Seems like the major shareholding mining company down in Mexico has no interest in playing nice in the sandbox with a bunch of hostile bully type A-holes. I imagine that's why they call it a Mexican stand-off.

If I had enough invested here to make it worth my while, I would pay a lawyer to demand another annual meeting just to rub this new management team's noses hard into every reason they had provided to vote against the last management team in their prospectus. As it appears, the new management's unwelcome takeover clearly caused the legal quagmire that resulted in Canarc's choice to back out of their offer, and in nearly every instance, this new team is also failing even more so on all the exact same points that they themselves provided as the reasons to vote against the incumbent team. I just hope they can get to a resolution before the two year annual report cutoff, and ticker ends up being revoked for failure to report their financials.

I see my once favorite, low price miner is not doing so well.

Ever since change of management. Downhill ...

At one time I thought highly of the potential here.

Actual miner at a low PP.

Now I am with BAA ...

Have the board of directors taken what $$$ this scam made and ran??? No REPORT, NEWS, UPDATE etc. You would have thought they would have said thank you suckers and good by.

I hear ya, and I am now happy I only took a very small starter position I can afford losing too. Looking more and more like an offset for some the nice gains I've collected on a couple successful of mid-tier silver plays, come December and if no change. I never had any faith in these guys without the Carnac deal closing anyway.

Tough one.

I prefer mid-tier nowadays.

I am under-impressed with current management myself to say it nicely. I'm not hearing any call to shareholders for an annual meeting, nor seeing any changes leave alone improvement, on any of the same points of criticism within the Vortex call to meeting/nomination prospectus either. It would be nice to have something good to say, in the meantime it's just a wait on dead $$ and see...

Seems that MRT doesn't like the new management
We don't had this issue as Neil was still in charge
The merger with Carnac would have solved this
A Bradford Cook is able to sort such things out

I guess with the right management this is the most undervalued silver producer.

Hope that MRT pays their bill eventually and management has decreased the admin costs that they can survive for a while

MXOM litigation news, 5pm 7/22, FYI;

TORONTO, ONTARIO--(Marketwired - Jul 22, 2014) - Pan American Goldfields Ltd (OTCQX:MXOM) (the "Company") is pleased to announce that the Judge of the Eighth Civil Court of the Morelos Judicial District has ruled in favor of Sunburst Mining de México SA de CV ("Sunburst"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, to force MRT to fulfill all its contractual obligations despite the lawsuit (mercantile ordinary procedure) filed by Corporativo Minero with the Second Civil District Court of the Morelos District, Chihuahua (the "Lawsuit"). According to the production agreements between MRT and Sunburst Mining de México SA de CV / Pan American Goldfields Ltd, MRT has to pay Sunburst de México the money owed to it for the production of the last quarter of 2013 and provide monthly and quarterly financial reports of the operation and audit the books of the operation on an annual basis and cooperate and act in good faith to assist Pan American Goldfields with its disclosure and audit requirements.

Mr Emilio Alvarez, the Company's CEO stated: "The Court ruling to enforce MRT's obligations is a positive development for Pan American Goldfields and all its stakeholders, including employees, shareholders and service providers who have supported the company throughout this period. We will be in position to file the audited accounts and annual report as soon as the accounts of the Cieneguita operation have been audited".

The Company believes the lawsuit filed by Corporativo Minero with the Second Civil District Court of the Morelos District, Chihuahua (the "Lawsuit"), is without merit and refutes all the claims vigorously. Sunburst is awaiting the ruling of the Court in the next few weeks and will communicate on any new development.

Emilio Alvarez, CEO

Pan American Goldfields Ltd.

About Pan American Goldfields Ltd.

We all drift aimlessly in the same boat together, and I'm not enjoying the ride either.

I think the only legitimate available avenue one might pursue for more up dated information about to the lawsuit, would be found in the relative Mexican court case filings. Otherwise, we must sit and wait on management, while hoping the battered hull holds together through the storm.

Looking to find out if anyone here has heard from the co. since the lawsuit pr? I've tried to contact co. and had zero luck in getting an update. Any thoughts, or feed back, appreciated.

Trading tends to be a bit light, and many holders are under water down here. Do your DD and good luck.

Nice volatility here.

Here is where the CFO resigned:

http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=10040682

Sheeeesh... What a twisted tale...

A big drop since then... MXOM

Yep...bag holder.

I read the report from 3M and all indications that there is gold in them hills.

Did not see mgmt missing payments and loosing the entire project.

And then there is the +51.58% today... low volume... MXOM

So this is what being a bag holder feels like..
No fun..ouch..

Pan American Goldfields Ltd.: Notice of Litigation

2014-05-06 11:41 ET - News Release

TORONTO, ONTARIO -- (Marketwired) -- 05/06/14

Pan American Goldfields Ltd. (the "Company") (OTCQX: MXOM), announces that a lawsuit (mercantile ordinary procedure) was filed by Corporativo Minero with the Second Civil District Court of the Morelos District, Chihuahua (the "Lawsuit"), and notified to the Company's Mexican subsidiary, Sunburst Mining De Mexico ("Sunburst") on March 21, 2014, suing Sunburst, Minera Rio Tinto, S.A. de C.V. ("Rio Tinto"), the Company's partner and operator in Mexico and Ejido Piedras Verdes y su anexo Cieneguilla Lluvia de Oro (the "Ejido") alleging, amongst other matters, a breach of contract following a supposed change of ownership at Corporativo Minero. The Company believes the suit is spurious and without merit. Accordingly, Sunburst has filed a response refuting the claim. Together with MRT, the Company is working to resolve the issue quickly and with a view to minimising costs insofar as is possible.

Emilio Alvarez, CEO

Pan American Gold Fields Ltd.

About Pan American Goldfields Ltd.

Pan American Goldfields is a precious metals mining and exploration company. Its focus is the production of gold and silver and the development and expansion of its La Cieneguita mine in Mexico's prolific Sierra Madre gold-silver belt.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This news release contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the United States private securities litigation reform act of 1995 and "forward-looking information" within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation. Statements contained in this news release that are not historical facts are forward-looking information that involves known and unknown risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements in this news release include, but are not limited to, statements with respect to the potential Transaction, the completion of a private placement, the benefits of the potential Transaction, the merits of the mineral properties of Pan American, the future performance of Pan American, mineral resource estimates and the Company's plans and exploration programs for its mineral properties, including the timing of such plans and programs. In certain cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as "plans", "has proven", "expects" or "does not expect", "is expected", "potential", "appears", "budget", "scheduled", "estimates", "forecasts", "at least", "intends", "anticipates" or "does not anticipate", or "believes", or variations of such words and phrases or state that certain actions, events or results "may", "could", "would", "should", "might" or "will be taken", "occur" or "be achieved".

Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Such risks and other factors include, among others, uncertainties inherent in the estimation of mineral resources; commodity prices; changes in general economic conditions; market sentiment; currency exchange rates; the Company's ability to continue as a going concern; the Company's ability to raise funds through equity financings; risks inherent in mineral exploration; risks related to operations in foreign countries; future prices of metals; failure of equipment or processes to operate as anticipated; accidents, labor disputes and other risks of the mining industry; delays in obtaining governmental approvals; government regulation of mining operations; environmental risks; title disputes or claims; limitations on insurance coverage and the timing and possible outcome of litigation. Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could affect the Company and may cause actual actions, events or results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause actions, events or results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that forward-looking statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, do not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. All statements are made as of the date of this news release and the Company is under no obligation to update or alter any forward-looking statements except as required under applicable securities laws.

Forward-looking statements are based on assumptions that the Company believes to be reasonable, the merits of the mineral properties of the Company, the accuracy of the mineral resource estimates of the Company, mineral exploration and development costs; expected trends in mineral prices and currency exchange rates; that the Company's activities will be in accordance with the Company's public statements and stated goals; that there will be no material adverse change affecting the Company or its properties; that all required approvals will be obtained and that there will be no significant disruptions affecting the Company or its properties.

Contacts:
Pan American Goldfields Ltd.
Emilio Alvarez
CEO
+1-416-848-9407
www.panamerican-goldfields.com/index.html

I think you may put a fork in this one. Canarc deal fell through. Must be something that's not good. Canarc will recover but not as sure about this one

The technical picture here is far from optimistic...

Canarc has provided a TSX listing up-date today;

http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&article=61750269

Key take aways from the PR;

"The TSX has advised the Company that in order to maintain the listing of the common shares of the Company on the TSX, the Company must meet the TSX requirements with respect to working capital and property expenditures. The TSX has granted the Company extensions with respect to these requirements and will be assessing the Company's progress with respect to the requirements in 30 days."

"...raising a total of $2.86 million. The Company expects that this satisfies the TSX requirement with respect to working capital."

"The Company expects that this will satisfy the TSX requirement with respect to property expenditures."

When (if) this merger closes (I think it likely will) MXOM shares should reach at least a ,12-.15 PPS value range just on that news. I'm thinking CRCUF will jump up to about .18 or better PPS on the closing, meaning at the .82% MXOM>CRCUF conversion rate .18x.82%= .1476 PPS post conversion value for MXOM shares by July, and that's not including the 1/4 warrant per share MXOM holders will also receive.

GO $MXOM

yes me too, It's been wait and see for the last year, some have been waiting and seeing from .19 down. GO MXOM

I'm sorry, I can only wonder what you are trying to say. I just picked up a few shares a couple of weeks ago, and will take a wait and see approach approach for at least few more months.

mxom now QB, last PR not to reassuring, Sounds like someone's shares are RIPE and ready! JMO

A new JACOBSEN ENTERPRISE interview with Catalin Chiloflischi, Canarc's CEO, detailing Canarc's most recent current events, forward looking strategies and goals, conducted on 4/3/2014. Definitely worth a listen for current and prospective MXOM shareholders IMO:

I like their way of communication. Is one indication for a good management. MXOM management was terrible on this part.

Particularly noteworthy from today's PR; "with respect to complete a business combination... are progressing and the Company expects to enter into a definitive agreement with Pan American before June 30, 2014."

People, you won't want to get caught chasing this train without a ticket to ride!

GO $MXOM!

Up-date on PP and merger progress PR, NICE!

http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&article=61490467

I believe your questions will be addressed by Canarc's management very soon, possibly within the next PR they release (a week or so?).

You might consider forwarding them directly to Canarc's IR with a call or e-mail, as Canarc's management is the only legitimate source that I would trust for a unbiased truthful answer. I would think they might tell you if the PP has closed, and if it has not yet, when they are expecting it to, but I doubt they would engage in describing why.

As to the TSX listing, it is my understanding CEO Catalin is actively working closely in cooperation with the regulators on quickly closing this issue, and that will likely be the only answer you will receive, until the issue is fully closed.

In the bigger scheme of things, I see these both more as small, short term and very surmountable issues that should have little if any influence over the longer term.

I think the main problem with MXOM if the deal doesn't goes through is the management. They are all bankers and have no mining experience. They have taken over the company, because they were unhappy with the previous management.

I thing the asset is perfect. It has a good resource and mining is already in place. The only thing that was missing was a management that knows how to grow the asset.

Canarc seems to fit perfectly.

The only thing that worries me is that Carnac seems to have own problems. What is the status of the delisting review?
This can be probably sorted out with the financing. Why is the $2 Mio financing not closed?

I like everything you are saying.

Appears MXOM is stable here. If I wanted back in, 0.04 - 0.049 would be the target.

Quite frankly I want to like ALL miners. The story with MXOM got too convoluted for me to follow, and I shifted away from riskier stocks ( i.e. under $1.00 )

I understand what you mean about MXOM not moving with the price of gold, and the much the same could be said about CRCUF too.

My situation is that I still hold such a large percentage of my portfolio in "on the house" PM stocks already, that it is hard for to justify putting a lot more money into the sector. Thats why I'm only taking small bites, and I'm using other "speculation" profits that became available here, calling it spec not PM (cheating really).

I'm mostly here for the arbitrage discount to add into my Canarc position. I have come across MXOM a few times over the last few years, and was never interested enough after some DD to consider taking a position before.

I tend to be a bit long term and contrarian minded, utilizing as few trades as possible. You might call me whatever, but I really think Canarc is a little baby Tyaz, that just really only needs to be fed some steady cash flow, to to become a full grown beast (aka; EXK).

I was a big fan of MXOM and MXOM stock holder.

When the tires blew out I was patient and stuck around.

It was when I saw GOLD climb out of the gutter at $1,180, and start to move north, I began to consider divesting.

You see, MXOM has not taken part in the PM miner recent move up. So if you had $1,000 invested in MXOM and you did not exchange into another PM miner, you missed the move.

I hate that and did not do that. I sold and enjoyed the ride up elsewhere.

If you have "extra" cash to park into MXOM right now, I guess investing at this time might be a decent play. Considering investing in a 5 cent stock carries risk.

My current holdings are $3.00 and above.

Appreciate you sharing your views. I agree that with the spot price of gold below $1400, the entire industry is mostly dead (profit wise anyway) and it could get worse before it improves. I am still nibbling here and there anyway. I believe by the time the herd starts moving with an analysts "all is clear, time to buy" call, the best buying opportunities will have been long past. I read your posts on several other PM boards, and in general agree with most of them. The (sick) amount of $$ I've made on EXK alone, allows me a fair amount of freedom to wait for the PM sector to find it's legs again, without worrying about it if it takes a few years.

I am seeing this MXOM/CRCUF merger as one of those better than average opportunities now, with a very very good chance for a double or more by the EOY. The downside on owning MXOM at these levels is if the merger falls apart. At that point I may take a small loss or choose to be stuck until the next offer comes along.

It seems you disagree. Where/what do you see as the pitfalls I may be missing?

I am a little surprised that anyone is left here. It has been months since GOLD left the station and left MXOM behind. It was pretty obvious, early on, that MXOM would not be partaking inj the GOLD party. Dead money. At least for now.

We do agree, this is what I see and my approach;

Buy MXOM per 10,000 shares @ .045= $460 with a $10 commission (if you pay that much, I do not).
Post merger get 8,200 CRCUF shares. CRCUF at today's low trading price of .08 x 8200=$666 (w. $10 comm.)
I am seeing an arbitrage of nearly 30% as a fairly juicy temptation, I just could not resist. When you look at where CCM.TN (canadian Canarc) is (low @ .095) even after currency conversion the gap is even larger.

Down side is the merger collapses, but even then the mine resources still hold enough value to justify that risk.