Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Recently this month LQMT inked an amended license agreement with Amorphology Inc. in the commentary LQMT states it gives LQMT a local US manufacturing source.
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/liquidmetal-technologies-amorphology-inc-enter-210900519.html
Now that sounds great. BUT, there is always a but! Does anyone know what capacity of there own does Amorphology Inc. have to manufacture. They do have an outside source but I’m not sure if they manufacture high volume orders on their own.
Anyone?
So just to get it straight. Like when a customer goes to LQMT for a part to be manufactured. LQMT goes to yihao abroad. Now when LQMT needs a part to be manufactured they go to Amorphology Inc., and Amorphology Inc. goes to blah blah blah to get it manufactured. Do I have this right?
All opinions are welcome.
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.
Ring company recently hits new SP low. if nothing else, perhaps a second quarter company anticipated FDA approval could spike the share price up and hopefully the company can get their act together to solve their own internal issues for anyone who bought shares. I do not own shares in the company. They came out with a slew of PR’s enticed interested buyers, then Crickets.
What gives? Can’t they just state in a PR for those who own shares they are working on solving whatever the issues are?
Was it a production problem, a software problem, or a lawsuit? Are people who ordered still waiting? Are they getting a refund or a discount for the delay? Not a good way in my opinion of doing business or getting new dice rollers at this point to roll.
Other than altering the picture on the LQMT website, LQMT, remains silent as they normally do not comment. At any rate any monies received by LQMT as stated in the 10K from the ring company is a good thing.
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.
Not to get off of the subject of LQMT but as a result of the propaganda believed by weak minded people believing in the repeated lies as the truth, an estimated 55 million to 75 million people lost their lives needlessly and horribly in a war, according to the data from the following link.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:World_War_II_Casualties.svg
The quote was used as a metaphor to all who misinterpret the truth as a lie and a lie as the truth.
It’s the same propaganda being used today in an attempt to destroy a candidate for President no matter what your political beliefs are. It’s not about quoting Nazi’s or quoting communists. It’s not about the left or the right or anywhere in between. Propaganda is propaganda no matter when it is used or whoever uses it to distort the truth. It’s not a narrow focus as you state in your post. It’s not exclusive to any political party. It even shows up many times on this LQMT board.
It’s a fact and that is not a lie.
And yes LQMT needs a good contract and modest contracts until we get there would not hurt either.
Many times a reply is not fully read or the question accurately remembered.
So here goes…
The question was an innuendo or a direct thought or accusation of when I post about the share price it always moves up on hype, but when the share price moves down it is always based on reality.
I guess many never read the bottom paragraph in the same reply:
Monday, 03/25/2024 7:27:00 PM
“It’s not that the share price moves up on hype or down on reality. It’s that there are no real revenue growing contracts in reality to move and sustain an increase in the share price for over a decade now.”
Never do I state the recent climb up is on hype.
In fact in a recent post I pointed this out:
“Monday, 03/25/2024 2:02:05 PM
Looks right now like a good shot to close above 0.08 cents this week”
And then there is this:
“Monday, 03/25/2024 12:18:31 PM
In essence the same volumes that have walked the share price down for factual reasons are the same volumes walking it back up for the same potential and expected ones that occur almost every year. Prior to November 2023 there were no news announcements from LQMT to inspire an increase or interest in the stock”
“In the meantime hype and pumping is a good thing in the absence of the real thing if it moves the share price up another 37%.”
Nowhere do I state the move up 37% from November is based on hype! In fact, this is what I posted!
Monday, 03/25/2024 11:44:17 AM
“There is a slight increase based on expectations from an actual insider purchase,10K, 8K and CC. Excluding the purchase. The rest are filled with forward worded commentary from the CEO.
Since the ceo purchase 4 months ago and the subsequent PR’s, the share price has gone up approximately 37%.”
All of these recent posts of upside I attribute beginning with the insider purchase and the recent CC, 10k and 8K PR’s coupled with the increase in potential and expectations from these events and forward worded commentary. Not once do I attribute the recent increase these past two weeks to any hype.
The mistake is believing in the question from the poster that I replied to.
The error was I only state reality when the share price moves down and hype when it moves up.
And the bigger mistake is when others believe the lie or error too, and chime in.
Never follow the crowd. Follow the facts.
Take a page out of history and learn a lesson many still have not learned yet….
““Repeat a lie often enough and it becomes the truth”, “ A lie told once remains a lie but a lie told a thousand times becomes the truth“
is a law of propaganda often attributed to the Nazi Joseph Goebbels.”
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.
In fact in my weekly posts I state the share price moving up or down means nothing for it is on very little trading volumes. People see what they want to see and not always what is there.
Why is it always hype? Because the share price doesn’t move up long term and is based on speculation not on the realities of LQMT’s actual reported 10Q’s and 10K’s year after year. But rather on unfounded speculation and rumors in which commentary and facts get stretched beyond Kansas and into the land of Oz.
One is wishful thinking which doesn’t sustain the share price on actual contracts and increasing revenues vs. what LQMT expects to do.
It’s why you hear LQMT on the CC call and 8K commentary to refer to the actual 10k and warn everyone repeatedly about forward worded commentary.
Reality is what you see every trading day. Anemic volumes interest and liquidity. Reality shows the fundamentals have not changed, nor sustained revenue increases.
It’s not that the share price moves up on hype or down on reality. It’s that there are no real revenue growing contracts in reality to move and sustain an increase in the share price for over a decade now.
Looks right now like a good shot to close above 0.08 cents this week.
In essence the same volumes that have walked the share price down for factual reasons are the same volumes walking it back up for the same potential and expected ones that occur almost every year. Prior to November 2023 there were no news announcements from LQMT to inspire an increase or interest in the stock.
There was some hype from around the www, which never pans out. Even the ring which was talked and bantered about daily has been put on the back burner.
Time will tell if they too can get there act together coupled with announcements of two more contracts would create another perfect storm to rocket up the share price and bring LQMT closer to an actual high volume contract and not a hyped expected one.
In the meantime hype and pumping is a good thing in the absence of the real thing if it moves the share price up another 37%.
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.
LQMT YOY up 15%. Nothing is happening.
Both the trading volumes, liquidity and interest have remained anemic throughout no matter what is taking place with the share price up or down.
There is a slight increase based on expectations from an actual insider purchase,10K, 8K and CC. Excluding the purchase. The rest are filled with forward worded commentary from the CEO.
Since the ceo purchase 4 months ago and the subsequent PR’s, the share price has gone up approximately 37%.
No actual contracts have been announced in over two years going into 27 months.
Not with this volume.
Nice to see buying more than selling. That’s all it takes to inch back to 0.09 and a dime.
Another week passes and LQMT’s share price is up 15.472% from 0.05998 cents to 0.06926 cents on extremely weak trading volumes and little interest. The same when LQMT moves up or down.
LQMT held a year end conference call Tuesday March 12, 2024.
LQMT is now into its 27th month without a new product order announcement, No new contracts for the order of parts.
On March 19th LQMT filed an 8k to amend a previous agreement using forward worded language that this would move LQMT closer to obtaining a high-volume contract. Personally, I thought that was the reason for touting the Yihao partnership about five years ago. You know 40 machines growing to 99 machines and so on and son. Five years later and dust, no high-volume part orders.
This is the first 8K filed by LQMT since JAN. 12, 2022.
Both the CC, the 10K and the 8K have raised the share price about 32%. IMO, the PR's should have doubled the share price and raised it 100%.
Let hope that past history is not an indication of future results as in the last 8K from over two years ago.
As I stated last week, Progress? Up to anyone’s interpretation of the CC. If one just relies heavily on forward worded expectations. (Not always a good idea.)
It is going to take the rest of the year to see if the little new interest in the stock has legs. Obviously, those with higher sights are looking for more than just forward worded well meaning expectations before they roll the dice and are willing to wait and pay a higher price. Otherwise, the volumes would be trading about 1% to 2% daily. Years ago, that would have happened based on expectations and hype and no contracts.
It is rather strange how a company can claim they need domestic manufacturing one year and not another year and then go back to claiming they need domestic manufacturing again. This happened three times if anyone is counting. You just don't know which executive is talking. Will the real TC stand up please.
I always thought for certain contracts and certain companies in lieu of the existing global babies not being always able to get along, that LQMT definitely would need a domestic partner to manufacture high volume orders and lesser ones as well. I do not doubt the timeliness for the amendment. There appears to be confidence in the manner of which TC spoke during the CC.
Shareholders have paid LQMT hundreds of thousands of dollars. The time to see potential for a real return on those investments are long overdue. The time for all of the expectations to bear fruit should begin this year.
Perhaps in 2025 or 2026 LQMT might succeed and if they ever do make it in 2024, all in it will be very thankful and glad that they did.
Will this be the year revenues increase consistently? The 2nd, 3D, and 4th Q’s will tell. I’ll be pleasantly surprised if the 1st 10Q tics up.
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC LUCK.
LQMT, please try not to play kick the can again it didn’t end well for 2023.”
Remember, without new revenues increasing quarterly and without progress due to cost of operations the share price is not averse to heading south again as stated in many of my posts. Fundamentals have not changed! cash burn is ongoing. No one bought the stock for rent revenue or market appreciation.
So far LQMT has done well to keep the stock from falling below 0.04 cents. They cannot let up now!
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.
As for me, until it happens, (the annual expectations call,) it’s nothing more than a rosy outlook of the game Kick the Can. Same for another partnership old or new. After 2017, my days of wishful thinking and hype are over.
Let the 10K be your guide and any new 8K of increasing revenues be the proof of TC’s integrity along with the fruition of his comments be LQMT’s success this year and for years to come.
I think you nailed it in your next post. Receiving fees imo, is what LQMT will get. Fees always seem to be of inconsequence. The exposure can open up more doors which may lead to a contract of consequence. Earnings of $2 or $3 million a year won’t do it. Commercializing the product will where consumers in large numbers can create the demand for high volume parts and revenues. From a earnings point of view it can be done while waiting for the whales to take the bait and then reeled in for the mega high volume contract.
Are all of the investors looking to break even? I don’t think so. What a low bar TC set. Breaking even doesn’t increase shareholder value. It resets the clock. Long term shareholders are not imo, looking to break even. Tempting yes! But not what many are looking for.
All have watched this game before. Little transparency, zero follow ups a wake up call and back to sleep.
Maybe asking for more than two or three reoccurring contracts a year is too much. But LQMT is now about to go into its 27th month without announcing a new contract small or large of any kind.
Maybe after two plus decades some shareholders think 3 customers are ok. I don’t. Imo, LQMT should have had many more reoccurring customers.
Maybe they have learned from those past mistakes. I won’t know until I see the contract pushing LQMT beyond breaking even.
My goodness! I can’t believe people are ecstatic over breaking even. I guess after being in the red for so long it sounds like success. It’s a big step in the right direction. Not success.
It would be nice if LQMT can get government contracts. But perhaps the affiliation with their partner abroad is a roadblock. I believe you are correct with the indirect point of view. And many times I pointed out in so many words that TC, imo, has been full of crap, when he gave the impression LQMT did not need domestic manufacturing. Especially when dealing with companies in the USA and global relations constantly being at odds with one another.
Good luck to you.
It’s not NASA. The bigger picture is the commercialization of Liquidmetal. Read the article fom the link posted.
One of the research founders of Amorphology briefly was employed by LQMT, when I first invested over 2 decades ago. LQMT back then had people with brains and vision. Not all though had vision and many investors sued LQMT. The brains of LQMT began to leave, the patents decreased and so did the revenues from actual sales. From that point in time bankruptcy was avoided by the Apple debacle and the Eontec debacle to buy time and grow partnerships with the opportunity to grow sales from these partnerships. So far only existence. This year new potential and a few eggs waiting to hatch .
If amorpology inc. is successful it may open the doors for LQMT to comercialize the gears or receive fees in an area of high volume demand. None of it is CE related.
Commercialization of LQMT would be the way to go and spread the Liquid Metal brand like weeds or a brush fire and spread quickly.
All depends on how smart and how aggressive LQMT will become. Until then it’s just another slumber party. Lots of laughter and then back to sleep.
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.
Looks like some newbies were attracted to LQMT today. Not enough to get LQMT out of anemic trading volumes, but getting closer to it.
Would be nice if more insiders purchased shares. So far silence.zzz’s
That would make it a very bullish signal.
It’s not new news….
https://www.nasa.gov/technology/metallic-glass-gears-up-for-cobots-coatings-and-more/
It’s another grant.
LQMT received upfront $25,000.00 dollars under the original agreement. A fee just for the agreement. Nothing to do with any other fees or parts. A one time payment for access to LQMT IP.
What they expect to receive under the amendment was redacted!!
Why?
Anyone?
No eggs hatched yet. But it bodes well for more exposure and perhaps more doors will open for the empty pockets sales reps to fill everyone’s pockets in LQMT.
Any reason in lieu of the CC, 10K and 8K, why the Ask can’t be raised to a dime? 🤔.
Or 0.15 cents?
Manipulation? Fundamentals? Historical experience? Disbelief? Integrity issues, ? no CE included? Why?
15 years ago if LQMT announced these things the hype mills the rumor mills and probably the MM’s would be pumping. Today…look around, crickets. 💤.
That’s just the way it is. I sure do support the success of LQMT.
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck
It’s not bad news. It’s just adding more capacity to manufacture at an unspecified price or contracts to fulfill that capacity to earn $$$, should it ever get to that point in time. Like the yihao capacity. I s the new capacity going to sit idle like the one in China pumping out low volume orders?
Either that or they sold on the good news of historical results from a new partnership.
In reality nothing bad happened. The volumes are too low.
If you need a similar explanation read this recent post…
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=174073145
I don’t want to negatively comment on a new filed document. Nor do I want to count the chickens before the eggs hatch. Everyone I believe has already been down that road with LQMT.
Unfortunately LQMT has proven everyone wrong except for those who already have been burned too many times before. I do not blame them for their disbelief, for LQMT has proven those investors who doubt whatever LQMT does to be correct 100% of the time. Trading under 0.30 cents a share, anemic trading volumes, anemic liquidity and very little if any new long term interest. Backed up by announcement after announcement year after year. What’s the saying? All hat no beef.
Could this be the year? As I always say every week; all will be glad if they do make it this year.
Definitely would be nice to see the sp go up to the numbers where LL and hype took us 7 years ago. Now that would be a nice start.
Not asking too much. If anyone thinks so. I don’t know why they invested in the first place.
Good luck to all in LQMT
Wish TC luck.
When there is never a break down of where money is received specifically in detail be it a partnership or contract. Only LQMT can answer your question.
But I will tell you what I do know, what everyone knows whether they are realistic or not. None of the partnerships or contracts recently have lead to earning enough money to increase the shareholder’s value, unless you consider deals to avoid bankruptcy. Other than that the $$$ earned have decreased shareholder value long term.
Every year investors expect and anticipate differently. I have enough shares in my long term and short term positions to handle success or another wash rinse and repeat cycle.
As you probably know I’m about keeping it real. Not into bashing or pumping or focusing on opinions of putting down posters by other posters.
Promising in exposure if nothing else. $$$ is never shared with shareholders until after the fact and then not broken Down by customers ! Why not?
It’s obvious LQMT is always in the red due to lack of meaningful contracts. Any meaningful contracts ended with the apple debacle and domestic manufacturing ended with the current LL debacle.
Promising is never at all meant to be a strategy for investing. Just another word for a rosy opinion on another partnership. There can be no substitute strategy for investing other than a significant contract.
Promising falls in the same category as expecting and hoping. None of which are good ideas for investing here or anywhere else. Not with the history shareholders have gone through here regardless of how hard people might be claiming to be working.
Pictures of parts no sales! Partnerships no follow up! Contracts then no follow ups. One cc call then silence until another filed document.
Integrity imo, has been missing for a very very long time.
Looks promising.
I sure hope those other two or three door knocking endeavors the LQMT sales reps find pans out a heck of a lot smoother than this one. And I sure hope this current one can correct itself soon like in the next quarter.
Otherwise it’s another Zyris type deal. You know reoccurring orders and then poof! The rabbit disappears and the top hat collapses and LQMT alerts no one.
As someone recently posted. You need a leader to succeed. From what I read unverified, it looks like LL is succeeding in leadership. If he doesn’t have the answers he finds someone who does. At least in China. Hopefully one day soon he will remember his roots and realize there are a few hundred million people here who also cook with pots and pans.
Back to the 10K.
So why are you suggesting someone sell? Why not suggest everyone buy? Selling is negative. Buying is positive.
Buy on bad news. Sell on good news. :)
Ring company hits another new low 0.389. I can see clearly where you draw your conclusions.
From historical facts.
The knowledge of these facts imo, keep the new potential investors away from this once promising endeavor to now a high risk dice roll. They want proof of success and not more proof of potential success and are willing to pay a lot more for it, when and if it ever does succeed.
Sounds like what is happening. One can control private testing. But when you experiment with 4000 customer orders and they are not shipped, that is a huge problem. Then you have the comments from consumers who have the product and you don’t know if the negatives are due to lack of knowledge, high expectations, bias from competitors or actual defects. But we do know right now since their last PR, there has been PR silence in all areas to address the concerns of both the consumer and their shareholders publicly. Leaves a huge void and leads to more questions. There seems to be a lack of understanding how the product works and a lack of explanation of what does not work from the company. Even from an unbiased report that supports the ring. The individual needed to contact the company for clarification on how to use the ring effectively.
I don’t know where your data is from. If true then the ring company has a lot of headwind up ahead.
I came across this article. Not sure if it is biased or honest. If true the ring company seems to be backing it up with their silence.
https://www.reddit.com/r/eviering/comments/1asy8wy/some_comments_on_the_important_evie_ring_shipping/
This too will only drag LQMT down as well, especially for all expecting more revenues from it as a reason. Could be why volumes and sp of LQMT headed south instead of north.
TC imparted what he believes lies ahead for LQMT 2024. The picture painted by him was a rosy one as well as very risky. The sp right now is stuck in too much risk.
Unless the ring company can get its act together. LQMT might be better off knocking on more doors to open up.
Well said! None of the cash received by LQMT’s non earned revenues has ever helped to grow the earned revenues from parts sold. Thus never increasing shareholder value, but forever decreasing shareholder value. It is the only reason why the share price peaked on expectations to about 0.44 cents seven years ago and continues to decline to present day, taking a pause only, when LQMT releases a pr.
Good luck to you.
There has to be a simple explanation for why no terms are publicly in print or were discussed on the CC. Might have something to do with the share purchase. I detest speculation. Years ago it made sense. Not so much today.
Based on those assumptions and LQMT’s numbers 40,000 rings may have been ordered.
A more accurate picture will have to wait for a PR from LQMT or Movano accounting for sales.
I say this only because $3 to $5 dollars per ring on approximately 4000 rings sold does not get LQMT to $127,000 earned as stated in the 10K.
Here it is no spin. 10K page 24 very clear and without any ambiguity. It is amazing when only a few read the 10K. No guessing required. Chipboarder, you are correct.
So if Movano sold X amount of rings. One then would get a fair estimate of what LQMT earns per ring based on the income they reported for those rings in the 10K. Would that be a fair way to nail it down? I think so.
From the 10K page 24…
“Revenue. Total revenue increased by $127 to $510 for the year ended December 31, 2023 from $383 for the year ended December 31, 2022. The increase was attributable to increase in product shipments primarily related to the launch of health monitoring rings utilizing our technology.”
It pays to do your DD. $127,000 dollars and the only guess work involved is the number of rings ordered. We can fairly ascertain that between 4000 and 4200 were sold. How many were ordered or what the terms are between LQMT and Movano Health requires more DD.
Chipboarder, your viewpoints on the earnings regarding the ring are spot on 100%.
My guess based on what Movano stated if the revenue is based on what is sold, is around $30 per ring. If it is on how many were ordered for manufacturing,then the earnings per ring are going to be less.
Either way, if the unknown terms of the agreement remains as is, this should be enough to stop the share price from heading down and to reverse the trend of the past seven years.
Meaning there is real potential for TC and LQMT to finally achieve LL’s goal for increasing shareholder value. Imo, once the share price increases to around 30 cents a share the floodgates of new investors will open up again.
This new potential should begin to increase trading volumes again and bring in new interest as the potential for LQMT’s share price is no longer speculative. Couple this with the expectations from TC for the year ending 2024 and hype will have added value as well.
Now regarding the 10k and the ring. The rest remains factually unanswered. As only 3 customers are mentioned always without any accounting breakdown. Plus no new agreement regarding any compensation from a fourth major customer.
If revenues from a new customer impacts growth to the tune of 15% 20% or more and it is not reported in a 8K or as a normal event, then it has to be reported as an extraordinary event. Otherwise they got big problems head on with the SEC. Again, as some people assume they might be ignorant. I don’t believe LQMT would want to attract the attention of the SEC again. To assume that revenues are being received by a source unreported is beyond stupidity. Even if there were an NDA. It would have to be reported as such.
Imo. They may an agreement based on future sales and kinks to be worked on if any. But zero money at this time. Otherwise accounts receivable would be through the roof.
Yes that does answer the time a non invasive product part can be approved for production.
!
So no one checked! Maybe it would have been easier if it was stated the high was 0.09 and the low was 0.09 for the year 2023.
Nowhere in the 10K is Movano Health or the ring mentioned. Although the company stated in the CC they worked on the project since 2022 and helped brought the ring to the market for sales to consumers.
More questions arise. No answers from TC.
Anyone...
Is this statement true? "During 2023, the highest bid price for our common stock was $0.09 per share, while the lowest bid price during that period was $0.04 per share."
Source: LQMT 10K. Page 16.
Anyone.
Here’s what seems to me to be a decent opinion on the Evie ring.
No hype no spin. March 8, 2024.
https://www.mindbodygreen.com/articles/evie-ring-review
There are other opinions now out there. Some more con than pro. Can’t tell if there are motives other than straight forward thinking.
Another week passes and LQMT’s share price is up 17.61% from 0.051 cents to 0.05998 cents on extremely weak trading volumes and little interest. The same when LQMT moves up or down.
LQMT held a year end conference call Tuesday March 12, 2024. Two links were posted to listen to the CC.
No new contracts in 26 months. No 8K’s. Silence.
Progress? Up to anyone’s interpretation of the CC. If one just relies heavily on forward worded expectations. (Not always a good idea.)
So rather than going through the usual spot on boring rhetoric. (Thank goodness.) This week I will just reprint one of my recent posts which imo, seems to be in sync with this past week’s trading and the CC and a couple of paragraphs inline with my expectations from the week before.
I will save the 10k for another time.
(Thank heavens he spared us more boring BS.) :)
Posted last week:
Perhaps CEO, Tony Chung can correct this with frankness and transparency in areas he is permitted to talk. If there is anyone that has a clue to LQMT’s immediate future, it would be Tony Chung. Based on what he says or does not say, can change the direction of LQMT north or south of where it is. After all this is the season for the wearing of the green.☘️ :)
Regarding the upcoming conference call, be it a one way or two way call, TC, can state if any NDA’s fell through or if he believes any NDA’s may come to fruition within one or two years, without disclosing a company or the field they are pursuing. He should have no problem discussing issues with the ring.
From a recent post this week:
Researchfyi
Monday, 03/11/2024
“Getting back to LQMT. LQMT stayed in the 0.05’s today. A step up in the right direction. Now let see if TC can bring it home and step it up tomorrow with some meat from his position as CEO and increase the real potential to induce new investors to pop LQMT up from the abyss of below 0.10 cents.
It’s not about the bells and whistles of a glossy website with CE foldable hinges courtesy of China. It’s about the real potential. Not the hyped up one’s of theories. It’s not about the past failures of last year or the 21+ sales reps with their pockets empty turned inside out.
All know the drill. Small contracts equals modest potential. High volume contracts was the focus these past few years. High volume contracts brings home the bacon.
Shareholders have paid LQMT hundreds of thousands of dollars. The time to see potential for a real return on those investments are long overdue. Imo, from watching the liquidity and volumes and numbers of trades, the stock is dead. The time is now to instill new interest not new hope and new expectations, which never has panned out. Let see if TC can do it. He doesn’t need a question. He needs to step up and share the answers.
And he sure as heck doesn’t need my worthless opinions either. But what the heck, they’re always worth less than the price of a LQMT share. :)
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC LUCK.
Please try not to play kick the can again it didn’t end well for 2023.”
Perhaps in 2025 or 2026 LQMT might succeed and if they ever do make it in 2024, all in it will be very thankful and glad that they did.
Will this be the year revenues increase consistently? The 2nd, 3D, and 4th Q’s will tell. I’ll be pleasantly surprised if the 1st 10Q tics up.
Did TC’s forward worded commentary create new real interest in the stock to attract new investors or did the CC, recreate new real expectations and temporary hype? Everyone has to decide for themselves.
Good luck to all in LQMT.
Wish TC luck.
As for me, until it happens, (the annual expectations call,) it’s nothing more than a rosy outlook of the game Kick The Can.
Let the 10K be your guide and any new 8K of increasing revenues be the proof of TC’s integrity and the fruition of his comments be LQMT’s success this year and for years to come.
Anyone note today’s LQMT trading volume?
How about the number of trades?
🤔
Ring company tanks at EOD hitting record low.
I do not own stock in the ring company.
You know it’s incredible in lieu of the small uptick and extremely low volumes and the many positive posts. I have to hand it to you. Your assessment is spot on.
No new contracts no 8K unless the $$$ involved has an impact on share price. Basically there still was no rabbit pulled out of the hat. Plus the constant put down of modest contracts vs high volume parts contracts in the past and now the innuendo that modest start ups are ok and high volume contracts from whales have too much oversight and or regulatory delays and are not so much on the front burner again.
The late great magician Houdini could never come close to the slight of hands LQMT just pulled off imo.
You either have a contract or you don’t. You either announce a purchase or you don’t!
Prototypes are a dime a dozen it seems. In LQMT’s case, less than a dime.
You want to talk about prototypes you rehire PH. Now there’s an executive who knew how to talk up prototypes. He had me sold.
You cannot have real potential increased by increasing the potential of forward worded commentary. 0 + 000 still equals 0.
Was the cc upbeat? Yes. Does it paint a rosy picture? Yes. Doesn’t it always? Yes. Do the 10k’s match? No. And it is the last thing that always counts. And if anyone doesn’t believe it. Then they have not been listening to TC’s CC at all.
Good luck to you.